Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2023 Sep 28.
Published in final edited form as: Br J Health Psychol. 2023 Feb 24;28(3):793–813. doi: 10.1111/bjhp.12654

TABLE 5.

Time 2 means and effect sizes for putative intervention mechanisms across conditions.

Variable Control (N = 94) Values (N = 95) d Social (N = 99) d Perspective circle (N = 98) d Imp. Intent (N = 100) d
Defensiveness (1–7) 2.95 (1.38) 2.93 (1.68) .009 2.91 (1.43) .03 2.84 (1.49) .07 2.92 (1.56) .02
Positive self-worth (1–9) 5.93 (1.97) 6.63 (1.84) .37* 6.01 (1.67) .04 6.34 (1.60) .23 6.07 (1.94) .07
Negative self-worth (1–9) 3.43 (2.05) 2.59 (1.95) .42* 2.88 (1.65) .30* 2.82 (1.77) .31* 3.19 (2.04) .11
Narrow self-assessment (1–9) 6.48 (2.06) 7.24 (1.67) .41 * 6.72 (1.56) .13 6.89 (1.41) .23 6.72 (1.70) .13

Note: Values are Means (standard deviation). Cohen’s d compares each self-affirmation condition to the control.

*

indicates p < .05.

Indicates p < .10 for planned comparisons. Control is referent condition.