Skip to main content
. 2023 Aug 14;9(3):411–427. doi: 10.1007/s41030-023-00238-8

Table 3.

Treatment differences in changes from baseline in combined rTNSS and rTOSS, SAR, and PAR subgroups

First week Entire 2-week treatment
Parameter Comparison SAR PAR SAR PAR
N = 512 N = 652 N = 512 N = 652
Treatment difference (95% CI), p value Treatment difference (95% CI), p value Treatment difference (95% CI), p value Treatment difference (95% CI), p value
rTNSS MP-AzeFlu vs. Aze* − 1.93 − 1.64 − 2.11 − 1.93
(− 2.72, − 1.15) (− 2.33, − 0.95) (− 2.87, − 1.36) (− 2.60, − 1.27)
 < 0.0001  < 0.0001  < 0.0001  < 0.0001
MP-AzeFlu vs. Flu** − 1.16 − 1.28 − 0.88 − 1.17
(− 1.95, − 0.37) (− 1.97, − 0.60) (− 1.64, − 0.12) (− 1.82, − 0.51)
0.0043 0.0003 0.023 0.0006
rTOSS MP-AzeFlu vs. Aze* − 0.63 − 0.59 − 0.67 − 0.59
(− 1.16, − 0.11) (− 1.04, − 0.14) (− 1.18, − 0.16) (− 1.02, − 0.16)
0.0177 0.0108 0.0101 0.0076
MP-AzeFlu vs. Flu** − 0.89 − 0.78 − 0.75 − 0.67
(− 1.42, − 0.36) (− 1.23, − 0.33) (− 1.26, − 0.23) (− 1.10, − 0.24)
0.001 0.0007 0.0044 0.0021

Least square means, (95% confidence intervals for pairwise differences), and p value (bold indicates statistical significance)