Table 1.
Mean concentration of macro- and micro-nutrients in mg/100 g (dw) ± standard deviation.
| Plant samples | Mg | Ca | Fe | K | Pb | Zn |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Acalypha rhomboidea | 10.23 ± 0.14cd | 1170.14 ± 17.00g | 8.21 ± 0.04h | 2268.20 ± 15.18f | 0.99 ± 0.11ab | 1.38 ± 0.01f |
| Asystasia gangetica | 10.42 ± 0.15d | 532.39 ± 25.76e | 11.20 ± 0.09j | 2180.15 ± 19.20f | 1.22 ± 0.07b | 1.82 ± 0.01h |
| Crassoccephalum sacrobasis | 9.83 ± 0.07ab | 150.12 ± 1.82a | 9.17 ± 0.03i | 3346.84 ± 486.86g | 0.98 ± 0.04ab | 2.36 ± 0.03i |
| Crotalaria ochroleuca | 10.05 ± 0.07bc | 122.18 ± 10.69a | 5.06 ± 0.03e | 839.48 ± 39.70bc | 1.77 ± 0.13c | 1.45 ± 0.01g |
| Heterotis rotundifolia | 9.68 ± 0.06a | 223.46 ± 9.19b | 6.13 ± 0.02f | 782.74 ± 4.90bc | 0.94 ± 0.03ab | 0.95 ± 0.01d |
| Hibiscus cannabinus | 9.48 ± 0.19a | 458.13 ± 20.47d | 4.31 ± 0.10c | 518.65 ± 2.92ab | 1.12 ± 0.25b | 0.98 ± 0.01d |
| Hibiscus sp. | 9.66 ± 0.11a | 576.40 ± 23.85e | 11.21 ± 0.08j | 532.28 ± 9.77ab | 0.87 ± 0.22ab | 0.73 ± 0.01c |
| Hibiscus surattensis | 10.23 ± 0.07cd | 835.88 ± 10.22f | 6.69 ± 0.03g | 288.37 ± 1.00a | 0.69 ± 0.11a | 0.55 ± 0.01d |
| Ipomoea eriocarpa | 9.81 ± 0.13ab | 118.51 ± 5.82a | 4.75 ± 0.04d | 1494.40 ± 14.92de | 1.19 ± 0.20b | 0.62 ± 0.02b |
| Maerua angolensis | 10.11 ± 0.20bcd | 523.73 ± 46.63e | 3.82 ± 0.04b | 1554.60 ± 13.65e | 0.98 ± 0.05ab | 0.52 ± 0.02a |
| Senna obtusifolia | 9.77 ± 0.02ab | 1265.30 ± 14.94h | 3.29 ± 0.02a | 1112.13 ± 4.49cd | 0.87 ± 0.06ab | 1.34 ± 0.01f |
| Vigna membranacea | 10.28 ± 0.07cd | 351.60 ± 11.31c | 4.42 ± 0.09c | 914.63 ± 19.13bc | 0.87 ± 0.02ab | 1.26 ± 0.01e |
All tabulated mean ± standard deviation (s.d) values were derived from triplicate sample tests. Turkeys test at 95% confidence level and statistical significance level was taken at p < 0.05. The superscript letters a, b, c, d, e, f, g, h, i shown in the table denote significant differences (p < 0.05). Mercury and cadmium were below detectable limits and omitted from table. A one-way ANOVA revealed that there was a statistically significant difference in mean inorganic components among the twelve wild edible plants: Mg [F(11, 23) = 17.73, p = 0.00)]; Ca [F(11, 23) = 1088.94, p = 0.00], Fe [F(11,23) = 7064.15, p = 0.00], K [F(11,23) = 115.42, p = 0.00], Pb [F(11,23) = 12.48, p = 0.00], and Zn [F(11,23) = 4400.87, p = 0.00].