Skip to main content
. 2023 Aug 24;382:e074258. doi: 10.1136/bmj-2022-074258

Table 4.

Results for knowledge, attitude, and behaviours

Outcomes Control (n=790) Intervention (n=786) Intervention effect
No (%) at baseline No (%) at 12 months (n=713) Change from baseline*: OR (95% CI) No (%) at baseline No (%) at 12 months (n=706) Change from baseline*: OR (95% CI) Intervention v control*: OR (95% CI) P value
Knowledge
Knowledge of salt intake recommended by Chinese nutrition guidelines 119 (15.1) 152 (21.3) 1.68 (1.25 to 2.27) 137 (17.4) 535 (75.8) 29.34 (21.41 to 40.20) 17.42 (11.32 to 26.82) <0.001
Having heard about low sodium salt substitute 141 (17.8) 219 (30.7) 2.54 (1.93 to 3.35) 169 (21.5) 552 (78.2) 22.18 (16.58 to 29.67) 8.73 (5.88 to 12.97) <0.001
Having ability to identify salt content on food label 240 (30.4) 221 (31.0) 1.15 (0.88 to 1.49) 255 (32.4) 505 (71.5) 11.28 (8.47 to 15.04) 9.84 (6.67 to 14.50) <0.001
Attitude
Willing to choose low sodium diet 627 (79.4) 582 (81.6) 1.18 (0.89 to 1.57) 644 (81.9) 658 (93.2) 3.38 (2.33 to 4.90) 2.86 (1.79 to 4.56) <0.001
Preferring less salty taste 244 (30.9) 235 (33.0) 1.06 (0.83 to 1.35) 211 (26.8) 314 (44.5) 2.37 (1.88 to 3.00) 2.24 (1.60 to 3.13) <0.001
Behaviours
Using low sodium salt substitute 40 (28.4) 37 (16.9) 0.61 (0.35 to 1.06) 35 (20.7) 142 (25.7) 2.23 (1.41 to 3.54) 3.66 (1.79 to 7.49) <0.001
Eating processed food once a week or less 426 (53.9) 386 (54.1) 1.01 (0.82 to 1.25) 423 (53.8) 463 (65.6) 1.68 (1.35 to 2.09) 1.66 (1.23 to 2.25) 0.001

CI=confidence interval; OR=odds ratio.

*

Results were obtained from mixed effect logistic regression model with random intercept of participants nested within family and random intercept of family nested within communities; all values were adjusted for age, sex, body mass at baseline and follow-up, city, and education level.

Questionnaires about using low sodium salt substitutes were filled out by people who had heard about low sodium salt substitutes.