Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2023 Aug 24.
Published in final edited form as: Cell Rep. 2023 Jul 3;42(7):112732. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2023.112732

Figure 2. CD4 T cells govern fate decisions of tumor-infiltrating monocytes.

Figure 2.

(A) Experimental approach to test the role of T cell subsets on monocyte fate.

(B) Proportion (left) and number (right) of Tomato+ intratumoral macrophages. Each dot is an independent mouse. Data are mean ± SEM; n = 3–5 mice per group; *p < 0.05; one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s posttest.

(C) Proportion of MHCIIhi or MHCIIlo Tomato+ macrophages. Each dot is an independent mouse. Data are mean ± SEM; n = 3–5 mice per group; ****p < 0.0001; one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s posttest.

(D) Experimental approach to test the impact of prolonged CD4 T cell depletion in tumor-bearing CCR2CreER R26TdTomato mice. See also Figure S3.

(E) Tumor weight from mice in (D); n = 3–6 mice per group. Data are mean ± SEM; **p < 0.005; Student’s t test for each time point.

(F) Proportion of Tomato+ macrophages from (D) that are MHCIIhi or MHCIIlo. Data are mean ± SEM; n = 3–6 mice per group; ***p < 0.001, ****p < 0.0001; Student’s t test for each time point.

(G) Representative histograms gated on Tomato+ macrophages isolated from PBS- or αCD4-treated mice.

(H) Proportion of Tomato+ macrophages expressing Arg1, CD206, and FRβ from PBS- or αCD4-treated mice. Data are mean ± SEM; n = 3–6 mice per group;*p < 0.05, **p < 0.005, ****p < 0.0001; Student’s t test for each time point.

(I) Representative PD-L1 staining (top) and MFI of Tomato+ macrophages from PBS- or αCD4-treated mice (bottom); n = 3–6 mice per group; *p < 0.05; Student’s t test.

(J) Representative plots and proportion of Tomato+ MHCIIlo macrophages that coexpress CD206 and FRβ from mice in (D). Data are mean ± SEM; n = 3–6 mice per group; ****p < 0.0001; Student’s t test for each time point.

(K) Representative histograms and proportion of Tomato macrophages that are Ki67+. Data are mean ± SEM; n = 3–4 mice per group; **p < 0.005; Student’s t test.

(L) Experimental approach to test the impact of T cell antigen specificity on monocyte differentiation. See also Figures S4AS4F.

(M) Tumor weight from (L). Data are mean ± SEM; n = 4 mice per group; **p < 0.005; Student’s t test.

(N) Proportion of MHCIIhi or MHCIIlo macrophages from (L). Data are mean ± SEM; n = 4 mice per group; ****p < 0.0001; Student’s t test.

(O) Proportion of Arg1+ macrophages from (L). Data are mean ± SEM; n = 4 mice per group; ***p < 0.001; Student’s t test.

(P) Proportion of MHCIIloCD206+FRβ+ macrophages from (L). Data are mean ± SEM; n = 4 mice per group; ****p < 0.0001; Student’s t test.

(Q) Experimental approach to test if transferred tumor-specific (OTII) or non-specific (SM1) CD4 T cells modulate monocyte differentiation in KPC-OVA-bearing Rag−/− mice. See also Figures S4GS4I.

(R) Proportion of MHCIIhi or MHCIIlo macrophages from (Q). Data are mean ± SEM; n = 4 mice per group; ***p < 0.001; Student’s t test.

(S) Proportion of Arg1+ macrophages from (Q). Data are mean ± SEM; n = 4 mice per group; **p < 0.005; Student’s t test.

(T) Proportion of MHCIIloCD206+FRβ+ macrophages from (Q). Data are mean ± SEM; n = 4 mice per group; **p < 0.005; Student’s t test. See also Figure S5.