Skip to main content
. 2023 Aug 11;9(8):e19104. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e19104

Table 3.

The teachers' attitudes toward the FSLP framework.

Variables Description Pooled (N = 226) Rank Male (M), N = 83) Rank Female (F), N = 143) Rank Diff (M − F)
Confidence A teacher is self-assured when teaching CRE using FSLP 4.58 1 4.55 1 4.60 1 −0.047ns
Platform The FSLP provides the teacher with the best stage set for teaching 4.57 2 4.53 2 4.59 2 −0.057ns
Directives The FSLP framework dictates the process of teaching CRE 4.25 3 4.14 3 4.31 3 −0.170ns
Preference A teacher wishes to use the FSLP while teaching 3.74 4 3.73 4 3.75 4 0.013ns
Understanding Current CRE content is comprehensible through FSLP 3.36 5 3.37 6 3.36 6 0.017ns
Application A teacher can jointly implement the 5 stages of the FSLP 3.35 6 3.39 5 3.34 7 0.050ns
Relevance FSLP is suitable for content delivery in CRE 3.41 7 3.33 7 3.46 5 −0.136ns
User-friendly FSLP is simple and convenient 3.19 8 3.28 8 3.15 8 0.130ns
Training
A teacher was prepared on how to apply FSLP
2.11
9
2.01
9
2.17
9
−0.156ns
Average attitude 3.62 3.60 3.64 −0.043ns

Mean attitude, Ns mean the difference not significantly different at p<5%.