Skip to main content
. 2023 Jul 28;19(16):5380–5393. doi: 10.1021/acs.jctc.3c00562

Table 2. Computed Electrical Conductivities (σ in Units of S·m–1) of Aqueous KCl Solutions from the EH Relations (Eq 3) for Different Molalities (m in Units of molsalt·kgwater–1) and System Sizesa.

  m nw ns ρ η σ σNE σNE+YH
Expt. 0 997.043 0.89 0
Madrid 0 4440 0 997.3(3) 0.85(5) 0 0 0
Delft 0 1000 0 997.9(3) 0.82(1) 0 0 0
Expt. 2 1081.5 0.90 19.98
Madrid 2 4440 160 1081.1(5) 0.95(5) 20.4(9) 24.0(1) 25.8(2)
Delft 2 1000 36 1080.6(1) 0.91(4) 20.8(3) 23.7(2) 26.7(3)
Delft 2 555 20 1080.8(1) 0.92(2) 20.8(5) 22.8(4) 26.5(3)
Expt. 4 1152.2 0.94 34.15
Madrid 4 4440 320 1152.3(5) 1.03(7) 32.5(6) 40.5(1) 43.1(1)
Delft 4 1000 72 1151.60(5) 1.00(2) 32.9(9) 39.7(7) 44.8(7)
Delft 4 555 40 1151.81(3) 0.99(2) 32.4(7) 38.8(2) 45.1(3)
a

All simulations were performed at 1 bar and 298.15 K, using the Madrid-Transport model. The number of water molecules (nW) and KCl molecules (ns), the corresponding densities (ρ in units of kg m–3) and viscosities (η in units of mPa·s) are shown for all molalities. Additional electrical conductivities computed using the Nernst–Einstein with (σNE+YH in units of S·m–1) and without (σNE in units of S·m–1) Yeh–Hummer finite-size corrections121,122,124 are reported as well. Numbers in parentheses are the uncertainty in the last digit of the results.