Table 1 |.
Microscope | Strength for IVM | Weakness for IVM |
---|---|---|
Wide-field | Very sensitive Fast imaging Commonly available microscope Cost-efficient |
Imaging depth is limited to tens of micrometres in non-cleared tissues Poor z-resolution |
Light sheet | Very fast imaging of large areas in three dimensions Minimum photodamage and fluorophore bleaching Optimally suited for embryos, brain and fixed tissue after clearing |
Very large data sets Imaging depth is limited to tens of micrometres in non-cleared tissues Cannot be applied to rodents Requires specialized microscopes and expertise Susceptible to shadowing artefacts |
Single-point scanning confocal | Thin optical section Commonly available microscope |
Imaging depth is limited to 100 μm in non-cleared tissues Slow imaging |
Spinning disc confocal | Thin optical section Fast imaging of single planes |
Imaging depth is limited to tens of micrometres in non-cleared tissues Requires bright samples due to large light losses |
Multiphoton | Improved imaging depth with hundreds of micrometres for three-photon and four-photon excitation in non-cleared tissues Thin optical sections Enables higher harmonics of tissue structures Up to seven channels simultaneously detected |
Requires specialized microscopes and expertise Costly |