Table 1. Analysis of the methodological quality of the studies.
| Author | Q1 | Q2 | Q3 | Q4 | Q5 | Q6 | Q7 | Q8 | Q9 | Q10 | Q11 | Q12 | Q13 | TOTAL |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lazarus et al.(23) | Unclear | Unclear | Yes | No | NA | Unclear | Yes | No | Unclear | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | 6 |
| Clark(24) | Yes | Unclear | Yes | No | NA | Unclear | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | 9 |
| Ieto et al.(13) | Unclear | Unclear | Yes | No | NA | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | 9 |
| Park et al.(15) | Yes | Yes | Yes | No | NA | Yes | Yes | No | Unclear | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | 9 |
| Byeon(16) | Yes | Unclear | Yes | No | NA | Unclear | Yes | No | Unclear | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | 7 |
| Diaféria et al.(14) | Unclear | Unclear | Yes | No | NA | Yes | No | Yes | No | Yes | No | Yes | Yes | 6 |
| Kim et al.(17) | Yes | Unclear | Yes | No | NA | Unclear | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | 9 |
| Byeon(18) | Unclear | Unclear | Yes | No | NA | Unclear | Yes | No | Unclear | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | 6 |
| Van den Steen et al.(26) | Unclear | Unclear | Yes | No | NA | Unclear | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | 8 |
| Hsiang et al.(25) | Yes | Unclear | Yes | No | NA | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | No | Yes | Yes | 9 |
| Park et al.(19) | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | NA | Yes | Yes | Yes | No | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | 11 |
| Park et al.(20) | Yes | Unclear | Yes | No | NA | Yes | Yes | Unclear | Unclear | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | 8 |
| Park et al.(21) | Unclear | Unclear | Yes | No | NA | Unclear | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | 8 |
| Lee et al.(22) | Unclear | Unclear | Yes | No | NA | Unclear | Yes | Yes | No | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | 7 |
Caption: NA = Not Applicable; Q1 = Was true randomization used for assignment of participants to treatment groups?; Q2 = Was allocation to treatment groups concealed?; Q3 = Were treatment groups similar at the baseline?; Q4 = Were participants blind to treatment assignment?; Q5 = Were those delivering treatment blind to treatment assignment?; Q6 = Were outcomes assessors blind to treatment assignment?; Q7 = Were treatment groups treated identically other than the intervention of interest?; Q8 = Was follow up complete and if not, were differences between groups in terms of their follow up adequately described and analyzed?; Q9 = Were participants analyzed in the groups to which they were randomized?; Q10 = Were outcomes measured in the same way for treatment groups?; Q11 = Were outcomes measured in a reliable way?; Q12 = Was appropriate statistical analysis used?; Q13 = Was the trial design appropriate, and any deviations from the standard RCT design (individual randomization, parallel groups) accounted for in the conduct and analysis of the trial?