Skip to main content
. 2023 Aug 23;154(2):1152–1167. doi: 10.1121/10.0020539

TABLE IV.

Fixed effects results of GCA with the intelligible speech masking condition as the reference condition, using reverse Helmert coding, conditions ordered as follows: (1) unmodulated noise maskers, (2) modulated noise maskers, (3) intelligible speech maskers. Significant effects are denoted in bold.

Estimate Standard error dfa t-value Significance
(Intercept) 100.5239 30.8596 15 3.257 <0.01
Factor1b 1.6835 1.6549 2460 1.017 0.309
Factor2 c 16.8560 0.9554 2460 17.642 <0.001
poly1 −43.2519 149.1077 15 −0.290 0.776
poly2 −512.6362 50.2481 15 −10.202 <0.001
poly3 −167.6486 41.8759 15 −4.003 <0.01
poly1: Factor1 b −43.5871 12.3839 2460 −3.520 <0.001
poly1: Factor2 c 92.3346 7.1498 2460 −12.914 <0.001
poly2: Factor1 b −52.3239 12.3839 2460 −4.225 <0.001
poly2: Factor2 c −14.4205 7.1498 2460 −2.017 <0.05
poly3: Factor1b 4.5410 12.3839 2460 0.367 0.714
poly3: Factor2 c −17.9502 7.1498 2460 −2.511 <0.05
a

Degrees of freedom (df).

b

Factor1 = modulated noise masking condition vs unmodulated noise masking condition.

c

Factor2 = intelligible speech masking condition vs the average of the modulated and unmodulated noise masking conditions.