Skip to main content
. 2023 Jul 10;49:101240. doi: 10.1016/j.gore.2023.101240

Table 3.

Logistic regression model* of the surgical and oncologic outcomes in the study population.

Predictor Postoperative morbidity
Adjusted RR (95% CI) P value
Cancer stage
1A Referent
1B 1.10 (0.23–5.21) 0.904
EBL
< Median (90 mL) Referent
≥ Median 3.02 (0.64–14.32) 0.163
Hysterectomy approach
Open Referent
Minimally invasive 0.27 (0.05–1.13) 0.071
CA-CCI score
< Median (7) Referent
≥ Median 9.06 (1.78–46.25) 0.008
Postoperative infection
Adjusted RR (95% CI) P value
Cancer stage
1A Referent
1B 0.80 (0.15–4.29) 0.790
EBL
< Median (90 mL) Referent
≥ Median 2.27 (0.42–12.37) 0.342
Hysterectomy approach
Open Referent
Minimally invasive 0.14 (0.02–0.84) 0.032
CA-CCI score
< Median (7) Referent
≥ Median 8.66 (1.53–48.91) 0.015
Three-year survival
Adjusted RR (95% CI) P value
Cancer stage
1A Referent
1B 2.97 (0.16–55.10) 0.465
EBL
< Median (90 mL) Referent
≥ Median 0.055 (0.004–6.41) 0.167
CA-CCI score
< 90th percentile (8) Referent
≥ 90th percentile 0.06 (0.004–0.87) 0.039

*Model also adjusted for histologic grade and lymph node dissection status. EBL, estimated blood loss; CA-CCI, combined age-Charlson comorbidity index; RR, risk ratio; CI, confidence interval.