Skip to main content
. 2023 Aug 9;24(16):12608. doi: 10.3390/ijms241612608

Table 3.

Current evidence of clinical applications of PRP and PRF.

Indication or Procedure PRP PRF
Achilles tendinopathy PRP is not superior to placebo treatment [105]
Acute muscle injuries Abundance of high-quality evidence [106]
Aging skin Temporarily induce modest improvement in facial skin appearance, texture, and lines [107]
Alopecia areata Abundance of high-quality evidence [108] Leukocyte PRF is superior to control treatment [109]
Androgenic alopecia PRP is likely to reduce hair loss, increase hair diameter and density [110]
Arthrogenous temporomandibular disorders PRP is more effective than conservative treatments [111]
Carpal tunnel syndrome PRP represents a promising therapy for patients with mild to moderate CTS [112]
Diabetic ulcers PRP may improve ulcer healing [113]
Elbow tendinopathy PRP injections improved pain and function more effectively than corticosteroid injections at the long-term follow-up [114]
PRP significantly improved pain and elbow function in the intermediate term (12–26 weeks) [115]
Greater trochanteric pain syndrome PRP is not superior to placebo treatment [116]
A single PRP injection is superior to a single corticosteroid injection [117]
Knee osteoarthritis PRP injections have a low risk of harm and beneficial ≥12 month outcomes [118]
Mandibular third molar surgery Decrease in prevalence of alveolar osteitis [119]
Maxillary sinus augmentation Improves the healing period and bone formation [120]
Medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw Abundance of high-quality evidence [121] Abundance of high-quality evidence [121]
Patellar tendinopathy Multiple injections of PRP obtained positive outcome [122]
Pain relieving and functional improvement [123]
Plantar fasciopathy PRP may provide a long-term effect in relieving pain [124]
Ridge preservation procedure L-PRF reduced the magnitude of vertical and horizontal bone resorption [125]
Rotator cuff tears PRP treatment decreases the retear rate and improves the clinical outcomes [104]
PRP improves patient outcomes [103]
L-PRF yields no beneficial effect in clinical outcome [126]
PRF has no benefit in improving patient outcomes [103]