Table 4.
Cluster | Compound | Technique | EC50 (µM) | n | Imax − Imin (nA) | R² |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
N.A. | SC-79 | APC | 61.8 ± 43.2 | 1.17 ± 0.38 | 2.45 ± 1.02 | 0.983 |
SSME 1 | 2.9 ± 2.3 1 | 0.89 ± 0.6 | 0.09 ± 0.04 1 | 0.893 | ||
LPC | 21 ± 32 | 1 | 0.91 ± 0.52 | 0.733 | ||
1 | 1 | APC | 10.8 ± 3.1 | 2.78 ± 2.1 | 3.96 ± 1.04 | 0.846 |
SSME | 12.9 ± 15.1 | 0.86 ± 0.34 | 0.91 ± 0.41 | 0.971 | ||
LPC | 3.8 ± 1.2 | 1 | 3.51 ± 0.42 | 0.993 | ||
2 | APC | 6.5 ± 2.7 | 2.38 ± 1.45 | 0.81 ± 0.18 | 0.88 | |
SSME | 30.3 ± 12.8 | 1.61 ± 0.81 | 0.74 ± 0.2 | 0.943 | ||
LPC | 15.9 ± 5.8 | 1 | 5.16 ± 0.7 | 0.981 | ||
2 | 3 | APC | no saturation | N.A. | 6.4 2 | 0.984 |
SSME | no saturation | N.A. | 0.46 2 | 0.969 | ||
LPC | no effect | N.A. | N.A. | N.A. | ||
4 | APC | 9 ± 3.3 | 1.43 ± 0.85 | 2.02 ± 3.63 | 0.905 | |
SSME | 70.4 ± 16.4 | 1.04 ± 0.08 | 1.21 ± 0.14 | 0.999 | ||
LPC | no effect | N.A. | N.A. | N.A. | ||
5 | APC | 54 ± 28 | 1.21 ± 0.33 | 9.72 ± 3.09 | 0.986 | |
SSME | 34.8 ± 4.2 | 2.7 ± 1.1 | 1.67 ± 0.17 | 0.993 | ||
LPC | no effect | N.A. | N.A. | N.A. | ||
3 | 6 | APC | no saturation | N.A. | 1.73 2 | 0.984 |
SSME | no saturation | N.A. | 0.48 2 | 0.984 | ||
LPC | 0.11 ± 0.07 | 1 | 1.95 ± 0.43 | 0.887 | ||
7 | APC | 73 ± 212 | 0.66 ± 0.54 | 3.25 ± 3.67 | 0.963 | |
SSME | no saturation | N.A. | 0.98 2 | 0.976 | ||
LPC | 0.2 ± 0.2 | 1 | 1.1 ± 0.35 | 0.83 | ||
8 | APC | 96 ± 181 | 1.19 ± 0.77 | 4.75 ± 5.66 | 0.946 | |
SSME | 9 ± 0.8 | 3 | 0.51 ± 0.03 | 0.985 | ||
LPC | 17.4 ± 6.6 | 1 | 2.07 ± 0.29 | 0.98 |
1 Effect of SC-79 in SSME reflects off-target effects that are also present in the control (Figure 9F). In SSME, missing effects of SC-79 are explained due to the absence of PKB [48]. 2 Since no saturation was observed, Imax could not be determined. Instead of Imax − Imin, we provide I(100 µM) − Imin.