Skip to main content
. 2021 Apr 21;104(2):00368504211011341. doi: 10.1177/00368504211011341

Table 4.

Univariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazard analysis of APLN expression and PFS for patients with cervical cancer in the TCGA cohort.

Characteristics Total (N) HR (95% CI) univariate analysis p Value univariate analysis HR (95% CI) multivariate analysis p Value multivariate analysis
N stage (N1 vs N0) 193 1.983 (0.986–3.990) 0.055
Clinical stage (stage II, stage III and stage IV vs stage I) 297 1.308 (0.821–2.084) 0.258
Radiation therapy (yes vs no) 304 1.288 (0.754–2.200) 0.354
Histological type (squamous vs adenosquamous cell carcinoma) 304 0.778 (0.433–1.397) 0.400
Menopause status (post vs pre and peri) 231 1.091 (0.640–1.861) 0.749
Histologic grade (G3 and G4 vs G1 and G2) 272 1.594 (0.967–2.627) 0.067
Age (>50 vs ≤50) 304 1.612 (1.012–2.568) 0.044 a 1.174 (0.688–2.002) 0.557
PIK3CA status (Mut vs WT) 286 0.994 (0.589–1.679) 0.983
Primary therapy outcome (PD, SD, and PR vs CR) 217 7.907 (4.631–13.500) <0.001 a 7.461 (4.342–12.821) <0.001 a
Race (Asian and Black or African American vs White) 259 1.066 (0.553–2.057) 0.848
APLN (high vs low) 304 1.683 (1.045–2.709) 0.032 a 1.741 (1.010–2.999) 0.046 a

CI: confidence interval; CR: complete response; HR: hazard ratio; PD: progressive disease; PR: partial response; SD: stable disease.

a

Statistically significant.