Table 5. Detection of α-CoV in pharyngo-tracheal swabs and feces in SARS-CoV-2-negative mink farms in France.
SARS-CoV-2 RNA RT-qPCR on | CoV RT-PCR of pol gene on | |||
Pharyngo-tracheal swabs | Pharyngo-tracheal swabs a | Pools of feces a | ||
Farm | Nb of buildings | Positive/tested (%) | Positive/tested (%) | Positive/”exploitable” (%) |
B | 2 | 0/120 (0) | 0/28a (0) | Not tested |
C | 9 | 0/395 (0) | 2/65a (3.1) | 1/25 a,b (4) |
D | 20 | 0/966 (0) | 9/143a (6.3) | 2/23 a,c (8.7) |
a Randomized collection from different farm buildings
b For farm B, of 56 pools tested, 31 samples tested negative for the presence of the beta-actin gene and were then considered as “unexploitable”. The prevalence was calculated as follows: samples that had tested positive for the presence of coronavirus RNA / total of “exploitable” samples *100.
c For farm C, of 34 pools tested, 23 samples tested positive for the presence of the beta-actin gene and 11 tested negative (these 11 were then considered “unexploitable” for calculating the prevalence).