Skip to main content
. 2023 Jul 28;59(8):1389. doi: 10.3390/medicina59081389

Table 5.

Clinical studies CO13, CO17, and CO21 of adjunctive cenobamate efficacy and safety.

Reference Study CO13, NCT01397968, Chung et al. [60] Study CO17, NCT01866111,
Krauss et al. [61]
Study CO21, NCT02535091, Sperling et al. [62]
Type of study Phase II, R, DB, followed by OLE Phase II, R, DB, DR, followed by OLE Phase III, open-label
Seizure type Focal, uncontrolled a Focal, uncontrolled b Focal, uncontrolled b
CNB starting dose mg/day 50 50 c 12.5
Titration schedule Increase by 50 mg every two weeks Increase by 50 mg every week up to 200 mg, then 100 mg/week thereafter c Increase to 25 mg for weeks 3 and 4, 50 mg for weeks 5 and 6, and then by 50 mg every 2 weeks thereafter
Titration phase, weeks 6 6 12
CNB target dose for maintenance phase mg/day (N of participants) 200 (n = 113) 100 (n = 108); 200 (n = 110); 400 (n = 111) 200, could be increased to a maximum dose of 400 (n = 1339)
Maintenance phase, weeks 6 12 ≥40
Compared group Placebo (n = 109) Placebo (n = 108) NA
Inclusion criteria Common 1. Taking 1–3 concomitant ASMs at stable doses; 2. EEG confirming the diagnosis of focal epilepsy; 3. prior neuroimaging
Specific 4. Adults 18–65 years old
5. ≥3 focal seizures per month (baseline period 8 weeks)
6. No consecutive 21-day seizure-free interval
4. Adults 18–70 years old
5. ≥3 focal seizures per month (baseline period 8 weeks), with ≥8 focal seizures during baseline
6. No consecutive 25-day seizure-free interval
4. Adults 18–70 years old
Exclusion criteria Common 1. Taking FBM for <18 continuous months; 2. history of status epilepticus, alcoholism, drug abuse, or psychiatric illness; 3. taking VGB within the past year
Specific 4. Taking intermittent rescue benzodiazepines more than once per month within the past month
5. Taking PHT or PB
6. History of >2 allergic reactions to prior ASMs
7. History of 1 serious hypersensitivity reaction
4. Taking intermittent rescue benzodiazepines more than once per month within the past month
5. Taking diazepam, PHT, or PB
6. History of a serious drug-induced hypersensitivity reaction or drug-related rash requiring treatment in a hospital, ASM drug-associated rash involving conjunctiva or mucosa, or >1 maculopapular rash
requiring discontinuation
4.Taking retigabine (ezogabine) within the past year
5. History of any drug-induced rash or hypersensitivity reaction
6. First-degree relatives with a serious cutaneous, drug-induced adverse reaction
Median % seizure
reduction from
baseline d
ITT population (primary endpoint)
CNB 200 mg (↓55%) * vs. placebo (↓21%)
mITT population (FDA primary endpoint)
CNB 400 mg (↓55%) * vs. CNB 200 mg (↓55%) * vs. CNB 100 mg (↓35%) * vs. placebo (↓24%)
NA
Responder rate,
% of patients e
• ITT population (secondary endpoint)
CNB 200 mg (50%) * vs. placebo (22%)
• Post hoc analysis (maintenance phase)
CNB 200 mg (62%) * vs. placebo (32%)
mITT-M population (EMA primary endpoint)
CNB 400 mg (64%) * vs. CNB 200 mg (56%) * vs. CNB 100 mg (40%) * vs. placebo (25%)
NA
100% seizure
reduction during
maintenance phase,
% of patients
Post hoc analysis
CNB 200 mg (28%) * vs. placebo (8%)
Secondary endpoint
CNB 400 mg (21%) * vs. CNB 200 mg (11%) * vs. CNB 100 mg (3%) vs. placebo (1%)
NA
Median % seizure reduction by seizure
subtype from
baseline
ITT population (secondary endpoint)
• Focal aware motor seizures
CNB 200 mg (↓76%) * vs. placebo (↓27%)
• Focal impaired awareness seizures
CNB 200 mg (↓55%) * vs. placebo (↓21%)
• Focal to bilateral tonic-clonic seizures
CNB 200 mg (↓77%) * vs. placebo (↓33%)
mITT-M population (post-hoc analysis)
• Focal aware motor seizures
CNB 400 mg (69%) * vs. CNB 200 mg (62%) * vs. CNB 100 mg (49%) * vs. placebo (↑11%)
• Focal impaired awareness seizures
CNB 400 mg (61%) * vs. CNB 200 mg (55%%) * vs. CNB 100 mg (32%) vs. placebo (29%)
• Focal to bilateral tonic-clonic seizures
CNB 400 mg (83%) * vs. CNB 200 mg (92%) * vs. CNB 100 mg (51%) vs. placebo (33%)
NA
Most common TEAEs, % of CNB patients (occurring in ≥10% of patients with any dose) • 22% somnolence
• 22% dizziness
• 12% headache
• 11% nausea
• 10% fatigue
• 18% (100 mg), 20% (200 mg), 36% (400 mg) somnolence
• 17%, 20%, 33% dizziness
• 10%, 10%, 10% headache
• 12%, 17%, 24% fatigue
• 7%, 10%, 15% diplopia
• 28% somnolence
• 23% dizziness
• 16% fatigue
• 11% headache
Serious TEAEs,
% of patients
CNB (1.8%) vs. placebo (3.7%) CNB 400 mg (7.2%), 200 mg (3.6%), 100 mg (9.3%) vs. placebo (5.6%) 8.1%
Hypersensitivity reactions in CNB-treated patients, n of patients 1 (reddening of palms and soles and itching of ears) 3 (1 non-serious pruritic rash with fever, 1 non-serious rash and facial swelling, 1 DRESS) 1
DRESS, n of patients 0 1 (randomized to 200 mg cenobamate with weekly titration) 0
Deaths, n of patients
(relationship to
study drug)
1 (unrelated, occurred prior to randomization) 0 4 (3 unrelated; 1 remotely related)

Abbreviations: ASM: antiseizure medication; CNB: cenobamate; DB: double-blind; DR: dose-response; DRE: drug-resistant epilepsy; EEG: electroencephalogram; FBM: felbamate; FDA: U.S. Food and Drug Administration; ITT: intention-to-treat; m-ITT: modified intention-to-treat; mITT-M = modified intention-to-treat-maintenance phase; NA: not available/not reported; OLE: open-label extension; PB: phenobarbital; PHT: phenytoin; R: randomized; TEAE: treatment-emergent adverse event; VGB: vigabatrin. a Treatment-resistant (≥3 seizures per month) despite treatment with one to three ASMs. b Seizures despite treatment with at least one ASM within the past two years and taking stable doses of one to three concomitant ASMs. c Initial starting dose of 100 mg/day with a faster titration schedule of 100 mg increments weekly was amended to an initial starting dose of 50 mg/day with a slower up-titration after a blinded review of the first nine patients. d Based on seizure frequency per 28 days. e Responder rate defined as ≥50% reduction in seizure frequency. * Significant at 0.05 level.