Table 5.
Preference values assessed by participants, criterion weights the right column, and the weighted preference values in the bottom row and the sum of the weights. (Step 2 and Phase 3 of the prioritisation process, which included decision conferencing).
| MHC BAME | PhysChks | IAPT svcs | MHCaccLT | CaregvrSup | InCrSubAb | Emplmnt | PeerSupp | HrmPrbsA | Weiwei | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Clinically effective | 70 | 100 | 100 | 90 | 50 | 70 | 30 | 0 | 20 | 21.5 |
| Patients involved | 100 | 0 | 80 | 20 | 90 | 70 | 65 | 100 | 10 | 16.7 |
| Reduces inequalities | 100 | 81 | 0 | 25 | 38 | 50 | 25 | 13 | 100 | 19.0 |
| Implementable | 100 | 50 | 70 | 80 | 70 | 0 | 20 | 70 | 30 | 23.8 |
| Sustainable | 70 | 100 | 70 | 80 | 0 | 20 | 30 | 0 | 20 | 19.0 |
| Total | 88 | 68 | 65 | 62 | 50 | 40 | 33 | 36 | 36 | 100 |