Skip to main content
. 2023 Aug 10;14:1185271. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1185271

Table 5.

Mean differences between the sociability ratings for the eight leadership behaviors.

IM IS IC CR MBA MBP LF
II 0.48*** 1.74*** −0.20 −0.11 −0.14 −0.16 1.50***
[0.15; 0.81] [1.41; 2.07] [−0.53; 0.13] [−0.44; 0.22] [−0.47; 0.19] [−0.49; 0.17] [1.17; 1.83]
IM 1.26*** −0.68*** −0.59*** −0.62*** −0.64*** 1.02***
[0.93; 1.59] [−1.01; −0.35] [−0.92; −0.26] [−0.95; −0.29] [−0.97; −0.31] [0.69; 1.36]
IS −1.94*** −1.85*** −1.88*** −1.90*** −0.24
[−2.27; −1.61] [−2.18; −1.52] [−2.21; −1.55] [−2.23; −1.57] [−0.57; 0.10]
IC 0.09 0.06 0.03 1.70***
[−0.24; 0.42] [−0.27; 0.39] [−0.30; 0.36] [1.37; 2.03]
CR −0.03 −0.06 1.61***
[−0.36; 0.30] [−0.39; 0.27] [1.28; 1.94]
MBA −0.02 1.64***
[−0.36; 0.31] [1.31; 1.97]
MBP 1.67***
[1.34; 2.00]

II, idealized influence; IM, inspirational motivation; IS, intellectual stimulation; IC, individualized consideration; CR, contingent reward; MBA, active management by exception; MBP, passive management by exception; LF, laissez-faire.

p-values were adjusted based on Scheffé post-hoc tests.

Values in parentheses represent 95% confidence intervals of the mean differences.

***p < 0.001.