Table 2.
Comparison of Proposed Molecular Methods for Bioburden Assessment of Spacecraft Surfaces
Methods | Analysis targets | Microbial diversity | Quantification | Previous NASA work | Turnaround time for data and analysis | Cost | Background contamination risk |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Molecular methods for bioburden measurements | |||||||
Real-time quantitative PCR | Variable, depending on primers | Noa | Absolute or relative | Yes | <24 h | $ | Variable, depending on assay specificity |
Digital quantitative PCR | Variable, depending on primers | Noa | Absolute | No | <24 h | $$ | Variable, depending on assay specificity |
Molecular methods for microbial diversity assessments | |||||||
NGS Amplicon sequencing | Variable, depending on primers | Yes | Relative, with possibility of absolute | Yes | ∼1 week | $$ | High |
NGS metagenome sequencing | All dsDNAsb | Yes | Relative, with possibility of absolute | Yes | ∼1 week | $$$ | High |
Assay specificity can provide evidence of specific taxa.
Most metagenome library synthesis is performed using protocols targeting double-stranded DNA; however, assays targeting single- and double-stranded DNA are available.
dsDNA; NGS.