Skip to main content
. 2023 Aug 25;6(8):e2331078. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.31078

Table 2. Multivariate Analysis of Clinical and Pathological Factors Associated With OS and DFS in Patients With IDC.

Factor OS DFS
Hazard ratio (95% CI) P value Hazard ratio (95% CI) P value
Age 1.026 (1.020-1.032) <.001 1.002 (0.997-1.007) .49
BCS vs mastectomy 0.80 (0.64-1.00) .047 1.02 (0.87-1.20) .81
Concurrent DCIS 1.00 (0.86-1.12) .76 0.99 (0.89-1.10) .81
Invasive size 1.28 (1.23-1.34) <.001 1.26 (1.21-1.30) <.001
Grade 2 vs 1 1.89 (1.22-2.94) .005 3.00 (1.99-4.52) <.001
Grade 3 vs 1 2.26 (1.43-3.58) <.001 3.17 (2.07-4.83) <.001
LVI 1.33 (1.15-1.54) <.001 1.36 (1.20-1.53) <.001
NI 1.07 (0.86-1.33) .54 1.05 (0.87-1.27) .59
No. of LNMs 1.051 (1.045-1.058) <.001 1.047 (1.042-1.053) <.001
DM 4.31 (2.92-6.37) <.001 NA NA
Ki67 1.69 (1.21-2.36) .002 1.16 (0.87-1.56) .31
HR positive vs negative 0.66 (0.57-0.77) <.001 0.82 (0.72-0.94) .003
ERBB2 positive vs negative 0.88 (0.76-1.01) .07 0.88 (0.78-0.99) .03

Abbreviations: BCS, breast-conserving surgery; DCIS, ductal carcinoma in situ; DFS, disease-free survival; DM, distant metastasis; HR, hormone receptor; IDC, invasive ductal carcinoma; LVI, lymphovascular invasion; LNM, lymph node metastases; NA, not applicable; NI, nerve invasion; OS, overall survival.