Skip to main content
. 2023 Aug 4;11(8):1322. doi: 10.3390/vaccines11081322

Table 4.

Comparison of vaccine effectiveness according to several factors observed in TND studies. (95% confidence intervals are presented in brackets; a p-value lower than 0.05 or 0.01 is identified with * or **; a comparison between studies that only use the TIV vaccine and the other; b comparison between studies where vaccine and circulating strains match and mismatch, only for TIV studies; c comparison between studies that only use the QIV vaccine and the other; d comparison between studies that only use the LAIV vaccine and the other, e comparison between studies where vaccine and circulating strains match and mismatch, all studies; f comparison between studies that include individuals with severe symptoms and those that do not; g comparison between studies that include inpatient individuals and those that do not; h comparison between studies that confirm the presence of the influenza virus using only PCR and those that do not).

Yes No p-Value I2 (%)
Adjusted estimate? 39.9 (30.5–47.9) 41.0 (36.8–44.9) 0.419 77.9
TIV? a 44.9 (39.1–50.1) 30.3 (22.0–37.7) 0.010 * 76.9
Match circulating strains, TIV? b 48.3 (41.7–54.2) 40.1 (29.1–49.4) 0.080 61.4
QIV? c 34.3 (29.6–38.7) 42.7 (36.4–48.3) 0.454 80.8
LAIV? d 5.4 (−20.7–25.9) 41.4 (37.1–45.4) 0.001 ** 78.5
Match circulating strains? e 45.1 (38.7–50.8) 35.1 (29.0–40.7) 0.017 * 69.8
Not only ILI? f 38.7 (33.5–43.5) 43.9 (37.7–49.5) 0.176 73.9
Not only outpatients? g 43.1 (33.2–51.6) 39.6 (35.1–43.8) 0.497 80.3
Only PCR? h 42.7 (38.3–46.8) 29.7 (20.4–37.9) 0.012 * 76.3
Northern Hemisphere? 39.1 (34.4–43.4) 44.7 (36.1–52.2) 0.196 80.2