Skip to main content
. 2023 Aug 15;16(8):1160. doi: 10.3390/ph16081160

Table 2.

Methodological quality of the included studies according to the risk of bias 2.0.

Author Year D1 D2 D3 D4 D5 Overall
Che 2004 Sc Sc L H Sc H
Chen 2004 Sc Sc L Sc Sc Sc
Xu 2005 Sc Sc L Sc Sc Sc
Liu 2006 Sc Sc L H Sc H
Chen 2007 Sc Sc L H Sc H
Huang 2007 L L L L Sc Sc
Zeng 2009 L Sc L Sc Sc Sc
Cao 2010 Sc Sc L Sc Sc Sc
He 2010 Sc Sc L H Sc H
Hua 2010 Sc Sc L H Sc H
Luo 2010 Sc Sc L Sc Sc Sc
Yu 2010 Sc Sc L H Sc H
Liu 2011 Sc Sc L H Sc H
Lu 2011 Sc Sc L Sc Sc Sc
Tian 2011 L Sc L Sc Sc Sc
Xu 2011 Sc Sc L Sc Sc Sc
Yao 2011 L Sc L Sc Sc Sc
Zheng 2011 Sc Sc L Sc Sc Sc
Jiang 2012 L L L L Sc Sc
Liu 2012 Sc Sc L Sc Sc Sc
Xie 2012 Sc Sc L H Sc H
Zhang 2012 Sc Sc L Sc Sc Sc
Zhou 2012a Sc Sc L Sc Sc Sc
Zhou 2012b Sc Sc L H Sc H
Chen 2013 Sc Sc L Sc Sc Sc
Ding 2013 Sc Sc L Sc Sc Sc
Mo 2013 Sc Sc L Sc Sc Sc
Song 2013 Sc Sc L Sc Sc Sc
Zhang 2013 Sc Sc L Sc Sc Sc
Cheng 2014 Sc Sc L Sc Sc Sc
Du 2014 Sc Sc L Sc Sc Sc
Li 2014 Sc Sc L Sc Sc Sc
Liang 2014 Sc Sc L Sc Sc Sc
Liu 2014 Sc Sc L Sc Sc Sc
Qiu 2014 Sc Sc L Sc Sc Sc
Zhang 2014a Sc Sc L Sc Sc Sc
Zhang 2014b Sc Sc L Sc Sc Sc
Zhang 2014c Sc Sc L Sc Sc Sc
Cai 2015 Sc Sc L Sc Sc Sc
Jin 2015a Sc Sc L Sc Sc Sc
Jin 2015b Sc Sc L Sc Sc Sc
Lu 2015a Sc Sc L H Sc H
Lu 2015b Sc Sc L Sc Sc Sc
Ma 2015 Sc Sc L Sc Sc Sc
Peng 2015 Sc Sc L Sc Sc Sc
Sun 2015 Sc Sc L Sc Sc Sc
Wang 2015a Sc Sc L Sc Sc Sc
Wang 2015b L Sc L H Sc H
Wang 2015c Sc Sc L Sc Sc Sc
Yuan 2015 Sc Sc L H Sc H
Zhang 2015a L Sc L Sc Sc Sc
Zhang 2015b L Sc L Sc Sc Sc
Zhang 2015c L Sc L Sc Sc Sc
Chen 2016 Sc Sc L Sc Sc Sc
He 2016a Sc Sc L H Sc H
He 2016b Sc Sc L Sc Sc Sc
Jiang 2016 Sc Sc L Sc Sc Sc
Shan 2016 L Sc L H Sc H
Wang 2016a Sc Sc L H Sc H
Wang 2016b Sc Sc L H Sc H
Wu 2016 Sc Sc L Sc Sc Sc
Xie 2016 L Sc L Sc Sc Sc
Xu 2016 Sc Sc L H Sc H
Yang 2016a Sc Sc Sc H Sc H
Yang 2016b L Sc L Sc Sc Sc
Yu 2016 Sc Sc L H Sc H
Cao 2017 L Sc L L Sc Sc
Cheng 2017 Sc Sc L Sc Sc Sc
Ding 2017 L Sc L Sc Sc Sc
Du 2017 Sc Sc L Sc Sc Sc
Feng 2017 L Sc L Sc Sc Sc
Han 2017a Sc Sc L Sc Sc Sc
Han 2017b Sc Sc L Sc Sc Sc
Li 2017 Sc Sc L H Sc H
Liu 2017 Sc Sc L Sc Sc Sc
Luo 2017 Sc Sc L H Sc H
Pang 2017 Sc Sc L Sc Sc Sc
Shi 2017 Sc Sc L Sc Sc Sc
Song 2017 Sc Sc L Sc Sc Sc
Wang 2017 Sc Sc L Sc Sc Sc
Wu 2017 Sc Sc L H Sc H
Yang 2017 L Sc L Sc Sc Sc
Zeng 2017 Sc Sc L Sc Sc Sc
Zhang 2017a Sc Sc L Sc Sc Sc
Zhang 2017b Sc Sc L Sc Sc Sc
Zhang 2017c Sc Sc L Sc Sc Sc
Zhang 2017d Sc Sc L Sc Sc Sc
Zhang 2017e Sc Sc L Sc Sc Sc
Zhao 2017 Sc Sc L H Sc H
Chai 2018 Sc Sc L Sc Sc Sc
Li 2018 L Sc L Sc Sc Sc
Liu 2018 Sc Sc L Sc Sc Sc
Luo 2018 Sc Sc L Sc Sc Sc
Ma 2018a L Sc L Sc Sc Sc
Ma 2018b Sc Sc L Sc Sc Sc
Xiao 2018 L Sc L Sc Sc Sc
Xie 2018 Sc Sc L Sc Sc Sc
Zhang 2018a Sc Sc L Sc Sc Sc
Zhang 2018b L Sc L Sc Sc Sc
Zhou 2018 Sc Sc L Sc Sc Sc
Chen 2019 Sc Sc L Sc Sc Sc
Ge 2019 Sc Sc L Sc Sc Sc
Han 2019 Sc Sc L H Sc H
Hu 2019 L Sc L Sc Sc Sc
Lu 2019 L Sc L L Sc Sc
Xun 2019 Sc Sc L Sc Sc Sc
Yang 2019 Sc Sc L Sc Sc Sc
Yao 2019 L Sc L Sc Sc Sc
Zhong 2019 Sc Sc L Sc Sc Sc
Chen 2020 Sc Sc L H Sc H
Hao 2020 L Sc L Sc Sc Sc
Ji 2020 Sc Sc L Sc Sc Sc
Liu 2020a Sc Sc L Sc Sc Sc
Liu 2020b Sc Sc L Sc Sc Sc
Lu 2020 Sc Sc L Sc Sc Sc
Qu 2020 L Sc L Sc Sc Sc
Ren 2020 Sc Sc L Sc Sc Sc
Shen 2020 Sc Sc L Sc Sc Sc
Wu 2020 Sc Sc L Sc Sc Sc
Yang 2020 Sc Sc L Sc Sc Sc
Zheng 2020 Sc Sc L Sc Sc Sc
Jin 2021 Sc Sc L Sc Sc Sc
Lan 2021 Sc Sc L Sc Sc Sc
Le 2021 Sc Sc L Sc Sc Sc
Tang 2021 L Sc L Sc Sc Sc
Wang 2021 Sc Sc L Sc Sc Sc

D1–D5: 5 domain criteria; D1, bias arising from the randomization process; D2, bias due to deviations from intended interventions; D3, bias due to missing outcome data; D4, bias in the measurement of the outcome; D5, bias in the selection of the reported results; H: high risk of bias; L: low risk of bias; Sc: some concerns.