TABLE 3.
Antimicrobial susceptibility patterns of E. lentuma
| Antimicrobial agent | MIC (μg/ml) | No. of strains
|
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Group A | Group B | ||
| Ampicillin | 2 | 25 | 0 |
| 0.5 | 0 | 6 | |
| Cefotetan | 128 | 4 | 0 |
| 64 | 13 | 0 | |
| 32 | 8 | 0 | |
| 8 | 0 | 6 | |
| Cefotaxime | 128 | 4 | 0 |
| 64 | 3 | 0 | |
| 32 | 18 | 0 | |
| 0.5 | 0 | 6 | |
| Ceftriaxone | 128 | 5 | 0 |
| 64 | 14 | 0 | |
| 32 | 6 | 0 | |
| 1 | 0 | 6 | |
| Imipenem | 2 | 6 | 0 |
| 1 | 19 | 0 | |
| 0.06 | 0 | 6 | |
| Piperacillin | 16 | 21 | 0 |
| 8 | 4 | 0 | |
| 2 | 0 | 4 | |
| 1 | 0 | 2 | |
| Clindamycin | 4 | 3 | 0 |
| 1 | 9 | 0 | |
| 0.5 | 13 | 0 | |
| <0.06 | 0 | 6 | |
| Metronidazole | 2 | 12 | 5 |
| 1 | 13 | 1 | |
| Chloramphenicol | 16 | 20 | 3 |
| 8 | 5 | 3 | |
All strains were β-lactamase negative.