Table 4:
Performance comparisons on the SARS-CoV-2 main protease (Mpro) and epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) benchmark set in terms of root mean square error (RMSE) in kcal/mol, Pearson correlation coefficient (R) and Spearmann correlation coefficient (RS) for different models before and after retraining using LP-PDBBind.
| Mpro Model | RMSE | R | R S | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| original | retrained | original | retrained | original | retrained | |
| AutoDock Vina | 1.20 | 1.17 | 0.55 | 0.66 | 0.51 | 0.68 |
| IGN | 1.86 | 1.44 | 0.64 | 0.61 | 0.69 | 0.65 |
| RF-Score | 2.06 | 1.64 | 0.43 | 0.52 | 0.47 | 0.58 |
| DeepDTA | 1.18 | 1.12 | 0.59 | 0.63 | 0.60 | 0.66 |
| EFGR Model | RMSE | R | R S | |||
| original | retrained | original | retrained | original | retrained | |
| AutoDock Vina | 3.11 | 1.59 | 0.25 | 0.38 | 0.21 | 0.36 |
| IGN | 1.06 | 0.96 | 0.36 | 0.65 | 0.17 | 0.62 |
| RF-Score | 1.57 | 0.97 | −0.15 | 0.52 | −0.18 | 0.45 |
| DeepDTA | 1.22 | 1.38 | 0.23 | 0.06 | 0.20 | 0.23 |