Skip to main content
. 2023 Jun 22;37(9):7012–7023. doi: 10.1007/s00464-023-10169-9

Table 1.

Difficulty grading classification for laparoscopic bile duct exploration

Difficulty grade Stone location Stone number Stone size mm Technical factors
Grade IA CBD 1–5  < 8 TCE, blind Basket-in–Catheter (BIC) technique
Grade IB CBD 1–10 8–10 TCE, blind BIC; CD diameter or configuration hinder cannulation, requring further proximal incision/dilatation. Or X-Ray guidance needed to engage stones
Grade IIA CBD 1–10 8–15 Choledochscopic TCE or Stone recovery from CD stump needs crushing or further CD incision. cystic anomalies (low or medial implantation)
Grade IIB CBD 1–15 Up to 15 Choledochotomy with or without biliary drainage or TCE with biliary drainage
Grade IIIA CBD or CHD  > 15 Up to 15 Choledochoscopic TCE for large distal stones or choledochotomy for large CBD or intrahepatic stones
Grade IIIB CHD Any Any TCE with choledochoscopic WBM stone retrieval
Grade IV Any Any Any TCE for Mirizzi type I/choledochotomy for impacted stones needing dislodging manoeuvres/need for antegrade stenting
Grade V Any Any Any TCE; transfistula exploration for Mirizzi II/CBDE for impacted stones needing fragmentation/open conversion/bilioenteric anastomosis e.g. Mirizzi Types III or IV

CBD common bile duct, CHD common hepatic duct, TCE transcystic exploration, BIC basket-in-catheter, CD cystic duct, WBM wiper blade manoeuvre