Skip to main content
. 2023 Aug 10;24(9):860–870. doi: 10.3348/kjr.2022.0850

Table 3. Comparison of operation time in patients with vs. without preoperative FN imaging using 3D-DESS-WE-MRI.

Method Group No. Operation time #1 Operation time #2
Median (IQR), min Coefficient estimate (95% CI) P Median (IQR), min Coefficient estimate (95% CI) P
Before PS matching MRI (-) 165 30 (30.0 to 40.0) Ref. < 0.001 40.0 (30.0 to 45.0) Ref. < 0.001
MRI (+) 105 25.0 (25.0 to 30.0) -0.28 (-0.35 to -0.21) 40.0 (35.0 to 55.0) 0.21 (0.14 to 0.29)
After PS matching MRI (-) 65 35 (30.0 to 45.0) Ref. < 0.001 40.0 (30.0 to 50.0) Ref. 0.653
MRI (+) 65 25 (25.0 to 30.0) -0.51 (-0.52 to -0.49) 35.0 (35.0 to 50.0) 0.02 (-0.07 to 0.12)
Stabilized IPTW analysis MRI (-) 133 30 (30.0 to 40.0) Ref. < 0.001 35.0 (30.0 to 45.0) Ref. 0.207
MRI (+) 83 25 (25.0 to 30.0) -0.28 (-0.35 to -0.21) 35.0 (35.0 to 50.0) 0.13 (-0.07 to 0.34)

Time to FN identification (operation time #1) and time to tumor removal (operation time #2) were transformed using natural log due to skewed distribution. Coefficient estimate (95% CI): Regression coefficient estimate, 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Statistical analysis using a generalized estimating equation (PS matching), or a logistic regression model with a stabilization (trimming) of extreme propensity scores (< 0.1 or > 0.9) (stabilized IPTW analysis).

FN = facial nerve, 3D-DESS-WE-MRI = three-dimensional double-echo steady-state water-excitation sequence magnetic resonance imaging, IQR = interquartile range, Ref. = reference, PS = propensity score, MRI = magnetic resonance imaging, IPTW = inverse probability of treatment weighting