Table 3. Comparison of operation time in patients with vs. without preoperative FN imaging using 3D-DESS-WE-MRI.
Method | Group | No. | Operation time #1 | Operation time #2 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Median (IQR), min | Coefficient estimate (95% CI) | P | Median (IQR), min | Coefficient estimate (95% CI) | P | |||
Before PS matching | MRI (-) | 165 | 30 (30.0 to 40.0) | Ref. | < 0.001 | 40.0 (30.0 to 45.0) | Ref. | < 0.001 |
MRI (+) | 105 | 25.0 (25.0 to 30.0) | -0.28 (-0.35 to -0.21) | 40.0 (35.0 to 55.0) | 0.21 (0.14 to 0.29) | |||
After PS matching | MRI (-) | 65 | 35 (30.0 to 45.0) | Ref. | < 0.001 | 40.0 (30.0 to 50.0) | Ref. | 0.653 |
MRI (+) | 65 | 25 (25.0 to 30.0) | -0.51 (-0.52 to -0.49) | 35.0 (35.0 to 50.0) | 0.02 (-0.07 to 0.12) | |||
Stabilized IPTW analysis | MRI (-) | 133 | 30 (30.0 to 40.0) | Ref. | < 0.001 | 35.0 (30.0 to 45.0) | Ref. | 0.207 |
MRI (+) | 83 | 25 (25.0 to 30.0) | -0.28 (-0.35 to -0.21) | 35.0 (35.0 to 50.0) | 0.13 (-0.07 to 0.34) |
Time to FN identification (operation time #1) and time to tumor removal (operation time #2) were transformed using natural log due to skewed distribution. Coefficient estimate (95% CI): Regression coefficient estimate, 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Statistical analysis using a generalized estimating equation (PS matching), or a logistic regression model with a stabilization (trimming) of extreme propensity scores (< 0.1 or > 0.9) (stabilized IPTW analysis).
FN = facial nerve, 3D-DESS-WE-MRI = three-dimensional double-echo steady-state water-excitation sequence magnetic resonance imaging, IQR = interquartile range, Ref. = reference, PS = propensity score, MRI = magnetic resonance imaging, IPTW = inverse probability of treatment weighting