Table 5. Quality assessment score according to the Newcastle-Ottawa scale.
Selection: representativeness of studies (maximum score of 4); Comparability: comparability of studies based on the design or analysis or analysis (maximum score of 1); Outcome: assessment of outcome and follow-up (maximum score of 3); Studies with a total score of 6-8 were considered high quality while 1-5 were low-quality ones.
Study ID | Selection | Comparability | Outcome | Total score |
Alavi-Moghaddam et al., 2013 [20] | 4 | 1 | 3 | 8 |
Ozkan et al., 2020 [21] | 4 | 1 | 3 | 8 |
Bahlis et al., 2021 [2] | 4 | 1 | 3 | 8 |
Ronda et al., 2021 [22] | 4 | 1 | 3 | 8 |
Feng et al., 2021 [3] | 4 | 1 | 3 | 8 |
Neto et al., 2021 [6] | 4 | 0 | 3 | 7 |
Estella, 2015 [23] | 3 | 0 | 2 | 5 |
Demirel, 2018 [24] | 1 | 1 | 3 | 5 |
Holten et al., 2020 [25] | 4 | 1 | 3 | 8 |
Olivia et al., 2021 [26] | 4 | 0 | 2 | 6 |
Cupurdija et al., 2015 [27] | 4 | 1 | 3 | 8 |
Anurag and Preetam, 2021 [5] | 4 | 1 | 3 | 8 |
Ranzani et al., 2017 [28] | 4 | 1 | 2 | 7 |
Günaydın et al., 2019 [29] | 4 | 0 | 3 | 7 |
Tsai et al., 2021 [30] | 4 | 0 | 3 | 7 |
Wen et al., 2020 [31] | 4 | 0 | 2 | 6 |
Putot et al., 2016 [7] | 4 | 1 | 3 | 8 |
Wang et al., 2020 [32] | 4 | 1 | 3 | 8 |
Bloom et al., 2019 [33] | 4 | 0 | 1 | 5 |
Williams et al., 2018 [34] | 4 | 0 | 3 | 7 |
Kim et al., 2013 [10] | 4 | 1 | 2 | 7 |
Aydin et al., 2019 [35] | 4 | 0 | 3 | 7 |
Akpınar et al., 2019 [36] | 4 | 1 | 3 | 8 |
Ito et al., 2017 [37] | 4 | 0 | 3 | 7 |
Lee et al., 2013 [38] | 4 | 1 | 3 | 8 |