Table 2. Comparison of bracket failures in the Maxillary arch .
| Tooth number | Groups |
Debonded
No. (%) |
Un-debonded
No. (%) |
P value |
| 11 | Group A | 0 | 12 (100) | - |
| Group B | 0 | 3 (100) | ||
| 12 | Group A | 2 (16.7) | 10 (83.3) | 0.44 |
| Group B | 0 (0) | 3 (100) | ||
| 13 | Group A | 1 (8.3) | 11 (91.7) | 0.60 |
| Group B | 0 (0) | 3 (100) | ||
| 14 | Group A | 1 (8.3) | 11 (91.7) | 0.60 |
| Group B | 0 (0) | 3 (100) | ||
| 15 | Group A | 0 | 12 (100) | -- |
| Group B | 0 | 3 (100) | ||
| 21 | Group A | 1 (12.7) | 7 (87.5) | 0.33 |
| Group B | 0 | 7 (100) | ||
| 22 | Group A | 1 (12.7) | 7 (87.5) | 0.33 |
| Group B | 0 | 7 (100) | ||
| 23 | Group A | 1 (12.7) | 7 (87.5) | 0.33 |
| Group B | 0 | 7 (100) | ||
| 24 | Group A | 2 (25) | 6 (75) | 0.60 |
| Group B | 1 (14.3) | 6 (85.7) | ||
| 25 | Group A | 1 (12.5) | 7 (87.5) | 0.91 |
| Group B | 1 (14.3) | 6 (85.7) |