Table 3. Comparison of bracket failures in the mandibular arch .
| Tooth number | Groups |
Debonded
No. (%) |
Un-debonded
No. (%) |
P value |
| 31 | Group A | 0 | 5 (100) | -- |
| Group B | 0 | 10 (100) | ||
| 32 | Group A | 0 | 5 (100) | -- |
| Group B | 0 | 10 (100) | ||
| 33 | Group A | 1 (20) | 4 (80) | 0.14 |
| Group B | 0 (0) | 10 (100) | ||
| 34 | Group A | 1 (20) | 4 (80) | 0.14 |
| Group B | 0 (0) | 10 (100) | ||
| 35 | Group A | 1 (20) | 4 (80) | 0.59 |
| Group B | 1 (10) | 9 (90) | ||
| 41 | Group A | 1 (20) | 4 (80) | 0.59 |
| Group B | 1 (10) | 9 (90) | ||
| 42 | Group A | 1 (20) | 4 (80) | 0.14 |
| Group B | 0 (0) | 10 (100) | ||
| 43 | Group A | 1 (20) | 4 (80) | 0.14 |
| Group B | 0 (0) | 10 (100) | ||
| 44 | Group A | 1 (20) | 4 (80) | 0.14 |
| Group B | 0 (0) | 10 (100) | ||
| 45 | Group A | 2 (20) | 5 (80) | 1.00 |
| Group B | 3 (20) | 5 (80) |