Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2023 Aug 29.
Published in final edited form as: Psychophysiology. 2022 Nov 13;60(4):e14217. doi: 10.1111/psyp.14217

TABLE 1.

Results from two-way repeated measures ANOVA on each MLR and LLR peak

dB
ISI
dB × ISI
F (2,50/58) p ε ηp2 F (4,100/116) p ε ηp2 F (8,200/232) p ε ηp2
P0 5.78 .005 1 .188 .40 .783 .89 .016 .67 .714 .82 .026
Na .42 .651 .98 .017 .69 .596 .65 .027 .74 .655 .88 .029
Pa 4.64 .021 .81 .157 1.60 .184 .93 .600 .77 .608 .86 .030
Nb .37 .683 .96 .015 4.19 .006 .84 .144 1.26 .267 .88 .048
Pb 41.45 <.001 .74 .624 33.64 <.001 .71 .574 4.05 <.001 .84 .139
N1 85.02 <.001 .62 .746 32.03 <.001 .85 .525 6.39 .001 .95 .181
P2 111.74 <.001 .67 .794 125.47 <.001 .66 .812 7.85 <.001 .95 .213

Note: Intensity (3 levels: 65, 75 and 85 dB) and ISI (five levels: 0.25 to 0.5 s, 0.5 to 1 s, 1 to 2 s, 2 to 4 s or 4 to 8 s) factors were used. Dependent variable was mean response amplitude over a time window around each peak. For each factor and their interaction, F and p values are presented along with epsilon sphericity index and effect sizes (ηp2). Degrees of freedom are displayed for MLR and LLR, respectively. p values below .05 are highlighted.