Table 3.

MajS and Iggy predictions upon perturbations of HIF1A for 3 Benchmarks

	HIF1A$=$–		HIF1A$=$0		HIF1A$=+$
Name	MajS	Iggy	MajS	Iggy	MajS	Iggy
ALDOA	(0,100)	Na	($+$,25)	$+$	($+$,50)	$+$
ENO1	(0,100)	Na	($+$,25)	$+$	($+$,50)	$+$
ENO2	(0,100)	Na	($+$,25)	$+$	($+$,50)	$+$
ENO3	(0,100)	Na	($+$,25)	$+$	($+$,50)	$+$
GAPDH	(0,100)	Na	($+$,25)	$+$	($+$,50)	$+$
HK1	(0,100)	Na	($+$,25)	$+$	($+$,50)	$+$
HK2	(0,100)	Na	($+$,25)	$+$	($+$,50)	$+$
HK3	(0,100)	Na	($+$,25)	$+$	($+$,50)	$+$
LDHA	(0,100)	Na	($+$,25)	$+$	($+$,50)	$+$
PFKL	(0,100)	Na	($+$,25)	$+$	($+$,50)	$+$
PGK1	(0,100)	Na	($+$,25)	$+$	($+$,50)	$+$
SLC2A1	(0,100)	Na	($+$,25)	$+$	($+$,50)	$+$
PDHA1	(0,100)	Na	$(-,100)$	−	$(-,100)$	−
PDHA2	(0,100)	Na	$(-,100)$	−	$(-,100)$	−
PDHB	(0,100)	Na	$(-,100)$	−	$(-,100)$	−

$Benchmark\_minus$ contained HIF1A=“–”; $Benchmark\_zero$ contained HIF1A=“0” and $Benchmark\_plus$ contained HIF1A=“+”. Here, “Na” means that Iggy could not predict for this Benchmark. MajS gives a predicted node as a tuple composed of the majoritarian sign and its average weight; the standard deviation is 0. The colours are focused on Benchmark_zero and Benchmark_plus; the enzymes predicted with “+” sign appear in bold. The ones predicted with “–” appear in italics