Skip to main content
. 2023 Aug 22;28:294. doi: 10.1186/s40001-023-01185-5

Table 2.

Summary of the characteristics of studies included in the meta-analysis investigating the effects of non-pharmacological interventions on health-related quality of life (HRQoL)—categorized by type of non-pharmacological intervention

Author/year Region Sample size (Ix/Cx)a Participants Mean age (range) % Female Intervention group Control group Duration HRQoL tool Summary of main outcome related to HRQoL
Physical activity interventions
 Ahadi 2013 [23] Iran—Single Center 31 (10: Treadmill, 11: Yoga, 10: Control) MS EDSS Score 1–4 34 (19–54) 100 Treatment 1: treadmill training consisted of 24 sessions of treadmill training (30 min), at 40–75% of age-predicted maximum heart rate. Treatment 2: Yoga group subjects participated in a thrice weekly 60–70-min sessions of Hatha yoga intervention Followed own routine treatment program 8 weeks MSQOL-54 The treadmill training program subjects showed a significant increase in the PCS. The yoga group also showed a significant increase in PCS (P = 0.02) and MCS (P = 0.00)
 Ahmadi, Arastoo 2010 [24] Iran—Single Center 20 (10, 10) MS EDSS Score 1–4 37 (19–54) 100 Treadmill training (30 min), at 40–75% of age-predicted maximum heart rate—3 times per week Wait-list control 8 weeks MSQOL-54 In the control group, there was no significant change in any of the MSQOL-54 scale scores. Differences between the treadmill training group and the control group were statistically significant in 5 items of the MSQOL-54 scale scores (physical function, pain, energy, health perception and physical health composite)
 Ahmadi 2010 [45] Iran—Single Center 21 (11i, 10c) MS EDSS Score 1–4 34 (19–54) 100 Hatha yoga classes 60–70 min 3 sessions per week Wait-list control 8 weeks MSQOL-54 Significant increase in some of MSQOL-54 scale scores in the yoga group (P ≤ 0.05). No changes for the control group. There was a significant difference found in both the PCS and MCS mean change between the intervention and control groups
 Backus 2020 [25] America—Atlanta—Single Center 12 (6, 6) MS EDSS Score 7–8.5 55 58 Participants cycled volitionally with assistance from the electrical stimulation (Functional electrical stimulation: FES) as needed and with oversight for safety by the exercise staff. The goal was for participants to train three times a week Wait list control 3 months MSQOL-54 Significant increase in the physical health, health perception, health distress, and PCS in the training group
 Barclay 2019 [26] UK—Glasgow-Single Center 24 (15i, 9c) MS EDSS Score 6–8.5 54 63 30 min of lower limb cycling programme using active passive trainers (2 min passive warm up, 26 min active cycling, 2 min passive cool down), 5 days per week Usual care 5 weeks MSQOL-54 Significant increase in both groups in both PCS and MCS. A larger effect size was demonstrated for the intervention group (0.93) and medium effect size in the control group (0.46)
 Bjarnadottir 2007 [27] Iceland 16 (6i, 10c) MS EDSS Score < 4 37 63 Outpatient aerobic and strength exercise program (60 min) three times a week Usual care—no change from previous 5 weeks SF-36 Significant increase in vitality and a trend toward improved QoL in 5 of 8 parameters of SF-36
 Carter 2013 [46] UK—Sheffield—Single Center 30 (16i, 14c) MS EDSS Score ≤ 5.5 40 (24–49) 87 Pragmatic exercise intervention (2 × supervised and 1 × home-based session per week) Usual care 10 weeks MSQOL-54 Significant increase in QoL which was sustained for up to 3 months after the intervention
 Dalgas 2010 [33] Denmark—Single Center 31 (16i, 15c) MS EDSS Score 3–5.5 48 65 Progressive resistance training of the lower extremities performed twice weekly Usual activity 3 months SF-36 PCS QoL was increase significantly more in the intervention arm and this was maintained at follow-up after further 12 weeks
 Hebert 2018 [35] America—Colorado—Single Center 88 (44, 44) MS 45 85 Balance and Eye-Movement Exercises for People with Multiple Sclerosis (BEEMS) was administered twice weekly with supervision and daily home exercise (phase 1) and in 1 supervised session weekly with daily home exercise (phase 2) No treatment 4 months SF-36 The BEEMS group showed a statistically greater increase in MCS compared to controls at 6 and 14 weeks
 Jeong 2021 [32] America-New York 45 (29i, 16c) MS EDSS Score 5.5–7.5 57 73 Custom home exercise program with additional assistance by the telerehabilitation system Usual care—custom daily home exercise plan 3 months MSQOL-54 Patients in the telerehabilitation group showed significant improvement in pain and cognitive function symptoms in comparison with the control group
 Kargarfard 2012 [47] Iran—Isfahan 21 (10i, 11c) RRMS (relapse remitting MS) EDSS Score ≤ 3.5 33 100 Supervised aquatic exercise in a swimming pool (3 times a week, each session lasting 60 min) Usual care 8 weeks MSQOL-54 Patients in the aquatic exercise group showed significant increases in QoL at 4 and 8 weeks compared with the control group
 Langeskov-Christensen [34] Denmark-multicentre 86 (43, 43) MS EDSS score 0–6 45 60 Supervised progressive aerobic exercise (PAE) sessions with one continuous and one interval exercise session performed each week Habitual lifestyle 24 weeks SF-36 No differences in the SF-36 were found
 Oken 2004 [36] America—Oregon 57 (15: Exercise, 22: Yoga, 20: control) MS EDSS Score ≤ 6 49 93 Group 1: weekly exercise class using a stationary bicycle along with home exercise Group 2: Weekly 90-min Iyengar yoga class along with home practice Wait-list control 6 months SF-36 Exercise and Yoga both significantly increase vitality on the SF-36 more as compared to the control group
 Pappalardo 2016 [43] Italy—Catania—Single Center 146 (49: outpatient, 49: inpatient, 48: control) MS EDSS Score 4–8 46 (25–74) 64 Group A—Outpatient rehabilitation: once daily, 6 days per week, each session 60 min Group B—Inpatient rehabilitation: twice-daily, 6 day per week, each session 60 min Wait-list control 5 weeks SF-36 Outpatient rehabilitation significantly improved all sub scales of the SF-36 and was found to be more effective at improving QoL than inpatient rehabilitation
Patti 2002 [44] Italy—Catania—Single Center 111 (58i, 53c) MS EDSS Score 4–8 46 (25–60) 58 Outpatient rehabilitation program, 6 days a week Wait-list control 6 weeks SF-36 QoL increase significantly in the intervention group and this was seen at 6 and 12 weeks. The difference was significant between the intervention and control for all 8 subscales
Romberg 2005 [28] Finland—Single Center 95 (47i, 48c) MS EDSS Score 1–5.5 44 64 Progressive exercise program, mainly consisting of resistance training, it combined resistance training (3–4 times a week) with aerobic endurance training (once a week) No treatment 6 months MSQOL-54 “There was no effect seen in the MSQOL-54. The scores on the PCS and MCS of the MSQOL-54 were stable with no differences between groups”
Behavioral and psychological interventions
 De Giglio 2015 [37] Italy—Rome—Single Center 35 (18i, 17c) RRMS 44 74 Dr. Kawashima’s Brain Training (DKBT): How Old Is Your Brain video game 30 min/day, 5d/wk No treatment 8 weeks MSQOL-54 DBKT improved QoL significantly in the MCS, role limitations due to emotional problems, emotional wellbeing, and cognitive function when compared to the control
 Jongen 2019 [48] Netherlands—Single Center 158 (79, 79) RRMS EDSS score ≤ 4 40 88 Intensive 3-day social cognitive treatment (can do treatment) No treatment 3 days MSQOL-54 In the intervention arm PCS and MCS were improved significantly at 1 month but this was not sustained at 3 and 6 months
 Momenabadi 2019 [49] Iran—Kermin—Single Center 80 (40, 40) RRMS EDSS score ≤ 5 30 (20–35) 85 18 training sessions based on the main constructs of the health-promoting self-care behaviors system. Training class twice a week in 45–60 min sessions. In addition to holding in person training sessions, patients in the intervention group were followed up by phone calls and texts during the training period No treatment 3 months MSQOL-54 There was a significant increase in 14 subscales of QoL, MCS and PCS in the intervention arm and this was not observed in the control arm
O'Hara 2002 [38] UK—Greater London 169 (73i, 96c) MS 51 (28–81) 70 Self-care programme primarily comprised a discussion of self care strategies supported by an information booklet developed for the study in line with consumer priorities—2 discussion lasting 1–2 h over the month No treatment 1 month SF-36 There was a significant improvement in MCS in the intervention arm as compared to the control arm
 Stuijbergen 2003 [39] America—Community setting southwestern US 113 (56i, 57c) MS 46 (25–60) 100 Lifestyle-change classes weekly for 90 min, then telephone follow-up No treatment 8 weeks and then telephone follow-up for 3 months SF-36 A significant improvement in the intervention arm was seen in mental health on the SF36 when compared to the control. There was no significant difference between the intervention and control for vitality, physical function, role–physical or role–emotional, social functioning, or general health
Nutraceutical/supplement interventions
 Ashtari 2016 [29] Iran 94 (47, 47) RRMS EDSS score ≤ 4 33 85 50,000 IU vitamin D3 every 5 days Placebo 3 months MSQOL-54 A significant increase in Mental Health QoL was seen in the intervention arm and this was not seen in the control arm
 Etemadifar 2013 [50] Iran—Isfahan—Single Center 54 (26, 26) RRMS EDSS score < 5 34 100 250-mg Korean ginseng tablets twice daily after breakfast and evening meal Placebo 3 months MSQOL-54 A significant increase in most of the domains of the MSQOL were seen in the intervention arm as compared to the control arm
 Namjooyan 2019 [40] Iran—Khuzestan 51 (26i, 25c) MS EDSS score 2–5.5 47 63 Two parts of ajwain and one part of Iranian borago were soaked in water for 24 h and one part of cinnamon was soaked in water for 72 h then were distilled—patients given 15 cc total per day (split in four capsules per day) Placebo 3 months MSQOL-54 A significant increase was seen in the physical and mental components of QoL in the intervention arm as compared to the control arm and this was sustained at 3 months
 Nozari 2019 [30] Iran—single centre 50 (25, 25) RRMS 30 54 5 mg daily folic acid tablets and three divided doses of 1 mg injective vitamin B12 Placebo 2 months MSQOL-54 A significant difference was seen in the physical and mental components of QoL in the intervention arm as compared to the control arm
 Siahpoosh 2018 [51] Iran—single centre 66 (33, 33) MS 32 68 Capsules with powder of grape seed extract (plus excipients 50 mg) twice a day Placebo 1 month MSQOL-54 A significant difference was seen in the physical and mental components of QoL in the intervention arm as compared to the control arm
Diet interventions
 Moravejolahkami 2020 [41] Iran—single centre 147 (68i, 79c) RRMS EDSS score ≤ 3 39 83 A modified version of Mediterranean Diet (mMeD), based on higher intake of fresh fruits and vegetables, whole grains, monounsaturated fatty acids, fish, and low to moderate consumption of dairy products, meat, and poultry Traditional Iranian diet 6 months MSQOL-54 A significant increase was seen in the physical components of QoL in the intervention arm, however, this was not seen in the MCS
Tissue manipulation
 Doğan 2021 [52] Turkey-multi center 66 (33, 33) MS EDSS score < 5.5 38 NA Reflexology was applied on each patient in the intervention group for 3 sessions a week No treatment 3 months MSQOL-54 A significant increase in the combined physical and mental health scores were found in the intervention group
Other interventions
 Shinto 2008 [31] America—Oregon—Single Center 45 (15, 15, 15) RRMS EDSS score ≤ 6 44 87 Intervention 1: naturopathic medicine which entailed 8 visits with a naturopath including daily supplements, Vitamins, diet intervention and counseling Intervention 2: MS education which entailed 8 visits with a nurse trained in MS care Usual care 6 months SF-36 “There were no significant differences between groups on any outcome measure”
 Vermöhlen 2017 [42] Germany—Multi Center 56 (25i, 31c) MS EDSS 4–6.5 51 81 Hippotherapy once a week Usual care 3 months MSQOL-54 A significant increase was seen in the PCS and MCS in the intervention arm

aIn the sample size column ‘i’ refers to the intervention arm and ‘c’ is in reference to the control arm