Table 5.
Efficiency scores, input–output original data and target projections for inefficient health centers according to VRS assumption (n = 12)
| Health center | Score-VRS | Input/output | Actual quantity | Target quantity | Difference | Percentage |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HC 17 | 0.595809 | Personnel cost | 27,821 | 16,576 | -11,245 | -40% |
| Stores | 33,429 | 19,917 | -13,512 | -40% | ||
| Other expenditure | 14,752 | 5,931 | -8,821 | -60% | ||
| Health center size (m2) | 508 | 87 | -421 | -83% | ||
| OPD visits | 8,806 | 14,780 | 5,974 | 68% | ||
| Other health center visits | 6,841 | 11,482 | 4,641 | 68% | ||
| Quality of care (%) | 47 | 79 | 32 | |||
| HC 18 | 0.845348 | Personnel cost | 41,173 | 27,681 | -13,492 | -33% |
| Stores | 54,880 | 38,182 | -16,698 | -30% | ||
| Other expenditure | 21,930 | 8,106 | -13,824 | -63% | ||
| Health center size (m2) | 235 | 172 | -63 | -27% | ||
| OPD visits | 18,401 | 21,767 | 3,366 | 18% | ||
| Other health center visits | 16,081 | 19,023 | 2,942 | 18% | ||
| Quality of care (%) | 56 | 66 | 10 | |||
| HC 11 | 0.972125 | Personnel cost | 32,368 | 29,136 | -3,232 | -10% |
| Stores | 33,190 | 32,265 | -925 | -3% | ||
| Other expenditure | 7,013 | 6,818 | -195 | -3% | ||
| Health center size (m2) | 132 | 128 | -4 | -3% | ||
| OPD visits | 2,982 | 5,536 | 2,554 | 86% | ||
| Other health center visits | 17,691 | 18,198 | 507 | 3% | ||
| Quality of care (%) | 72 | 74 | 2 | |||
| HC 14 | 1 | Personnel cost | 23,024 | 21,385 | -1,639 | -7% |
| (CRS TE: 0.924828) | Stores | 20,201 | 17,263 | -2,938 | -15% | |
| Other expenditure | 3,747 | 3,747 | 0 | 0% | ||
| Health center size (m2) | 150 | 122 | -28 | -19% | ||
| OPD visits | 4,726 | 13,491 | 8,765 | 185% | ||
| Other health center visits | 5,479 | 10,488 | 5,009 | 91% | ||
| Quality of care (%) | 47 | 47 | 0 | |||
| HC 19 | 0.654597 | Personnel cost | 38,732 | 20,783 | -17,949 | -46% |
| Stores | 36,330 | 23,782 | -12,548 | -35% | ||
| Other expenditure | 25,009 | 6,576 | -18,433 | -74% | ||
| Health center size (m2) | 373 | 147 | -226 | -61% | ||
| OPD visits | 11,555 | 17,652 | 6,097 | 53% | ||
| Other health center visits | 15,234 | 23,272 | 8,038 | 53% | ||
| Quality of care (%) | 38 | 67 | 29 | 77% | ||
| HC 7 | 1 | Personnel cost | 20,335 | 18,522 | -1,813 | -9% |
| (CRS TE: 0.823031) | Stores | 14,649 | 12,736 | -1,913 | -9% | |
| Other expenditure | 5,764 | 3,649 | -2,115 | -37% | ||
| Health center size (m2) | 162 | 104 | -58 | -36% | ||
| OPD visits | 8,851 | 13,345 | 4,494 | 51% | ||
| Other health center visits | 2,081 | 7,060 | 4,979 | 239% | ||
| Quality of care (%) | 41 | 41 | 0 | |||
| HC 24 | 0.893818 | Personnel cost | 27,394 | 24,336 | -3,058 | -11% |
| Stores | 40,318 | 34,625 | -5,692 | -14% | ||
| Other expenditure | 8,084 | 7,038 | -1,046 | -13% | ||
| Health center size (m2) | 120 | 107 | -13 | -11% | ||
| OPD visits | 6,207 | 8,030 | 1,823 | 29% | ||
| Other health center visits | 7,393 | 12,452 | 5,059 | 68% | ||
| Quality of care (%) | 77 | 87 | 9 | |||
| HC 22 | 0.802447 | Personnel cost | 42,104 | 28,462 | -13,642 | -32% |
| Stores | 52,690 | 30,517 | -22,173 | -42% | ||
| Other expenditure | 17,521 | 10,380 | -7,141 | -41% | ||
| Health center size (m2) | 492 | 115 | -377 | -77% | ||
| OPD visits | 6,887 | 8,582 | 1,695 | 25% | ||
| Other health center visits | 15,093 | 22,201 | 7,108 | 47% | ||
| Quality of care (%) | 70 | 87 | 17 | |||
| HC 35 | 0.525233 | Personnel cost | 35,549 | 18,672 | -16,877 | -47% |
| Stores | 61,822 | 21,609 | -40,213 | -65% | ||
| Other expenditure | 9,948 | 5,225 | -4,723 | -47% | ||
| Health center size (m2) | 242 | 110 | -132 | -54% | ||
| OPD visits | 8,895 | 16,935 | 8,040 | 90% | ||
| Other health center visits | 12,938 | 24,633 | 11,695 | 90% | ||
| Quality of care (%) | 34 | 66 | 32 | |||
| HCWB 1 | 0.658735 | Personnel cost | 58,114 | 21,060 | -37,054 | -64% |
| Stores | 37,100 | 19,322 | -17,778 | -48% | ||
| Other expenditure | 20,147 | 4,356 | -15,791 | -78% | ||
| Health center size (m2) | 859 | 97 | -762 | -89% | ||
| OPD visits | 14,396 | 21,854 | 7,458 | 52% | ||
| Other health center visits | 5,910 | 8,972 | 3,062 | 52% | ||
| Quality of care (%) | 48 | 73 | 25 | |||
| HCWB 5 | 0.770264 | Personnel cost | 72,162 | 29,787 | -42,375 | -59% |
| Stores | 81,684 | 46,315 | -35,369 | -43% | ||
| Other expenditure | 37,575 | 11,704 | -25,871 | -69% | ||
| Health center size (m2) | 641 | 210 | -431 | -67% | ||
| OPD visits | 10,059 | 15,434 | 5,375 | 53% | ||
| Other health center visits | 24,562 | 31,888 | 7,326 | 30% | ||
| Quality of care (%) | 62 | 81 | 19 | |||
| HCWB 4 | 0.951985 | Personnel cost | 61,787 | 40,456 | -21,331 | -35% |
| Stores Other expenditure | 54,937 | 52,299 | -2,638 | -5% | ||
| Other expenditure | 10,318 | 9,822 | -496 | -5% | ||
| Health center size (m2) | 477 | 231 | -246 | -51% | ||
| OPD visits | 7,184 | 9,380 | 2,196 | 31% | ||
| Other health center visits | 21,834 | 22,935 | 1,101 | 5% | ||
| Quality of care (%) | 79 | 83 | 4 |
Abbreviations: CRS Constant returns to scale, HC Health center, HCWB Health center with beds, OPD Outpatient department, TE Technical efficiency, VRS Variable returns to scale