Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2023 Aug 29.
Published in final edited form as: Prog Biophys Mol Biol. 2018 Apr 5;137:52–68. doi: 10.1016/j.pbiomolbio.2018.03.008

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1.

A schematic of functional Vmem patterns observed in frog and insect development, as well as planaria regeneration. Xenopus laevis neurula exhibit a characteristic Vmem pattern with strong hyperpolarization in cells of the closing neural tube and depolarization in the surrounding neural folds (A). Genetic mis-expression of specific ion channels or pharmacological treatments can flatten the endogenous Vmem pattern by creating a more uniform depolarization or hyperpolarization, where both induced severe brain and eye defects (A). Moreover, for depolarization treatments (e.g. Notch ICD or nicotine), expression of Kv1.5 or HCN2 restored the normal Vmem pattern and produced normal brain and eye development (A). In whole planaria flatworms (B), an anterior-posterior gradient of Vmem exists with significantly stronger depolarization at the anterior (B). During normal regeneration, a strong anterior depolarization appears, which is believed to be instructive for anterior-posterior axis polarity (B). Depolarizing a fragment during regeneration induces 2H outcomes in regenerates (B). In insect ovarian follicles, an endogenous Vmem gradient features an oocyte which is more depolarized than the nurse cells (C). Patterns of soluble acidic (negatively charged) and basic (positively charged) proteins may be correlated with the Vmem pattern in the ovarian follicle, with more acidic proteins found in the oocyte and more basic proteins found in the nurse cells, thereby supporting the hypothesis that small charged molecules travel by electrodiffusion across intercellular connections such as gap junctions (C).