Table 2.
Results of the quality assessment.
|
| ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| STUDY | RESEARCH DESIGN | QA1 | QA2 | QA3 | QA4 | QA5 | NUMBER OF CRITERIA FULFILLED | INCLUSION IN THE REVIEW |
|
| ||||||||
| Bylow et al. [21] | QN (R) | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | 5/5 | ✓ |
|
| ||||||||
| Cheskes et al. [22] | QN (DC) | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | 5/5 | ✓ |
|
| ||||||||
| Fan et al. [23] | QN (DC) | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | 5/5 | ✓ |
|
| ||||||||
| Hawkes et al. [24] | QN (DC) | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | 5/5 | ✓ |
|
| ||||||||
| Krammel et al. [25] | QN (NR) | Y | N | Y | C | Y | 3/5 | ✓ |
|
| ||||||||
| Lee et al. [26] | QN (NR) | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | 5/5 | ✓ |
|
| ||||||||
| Liaw et al. [27] | QN (NR) | Y | Y | Y | N | Y | 4/5 | ✓ |
|
| ||||||||
| Pei-Chuan Huang et al. [28] | QN (DC) | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | 5/5 | ✓ |
|
| ||||||||
| Pei-Chuan Huang et al. [29] | QN (DC) | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | 5/5 | ✓ |
|
| ||||||||
| Post et al. [30] | QN (NR) | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | 5/5 | ✓ |
|
| ||||||||
| Qian et al. [31] | QN (DC) | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | 5/5 | ✓ |
|
| ||||||||
| Shams et al. [32] | QN (DC) | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | 5/5 | ✓ |
|
| ||||||||
| Son et al. [33] | QN (DC) | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | 5/5 | ✓ |
|
| ||||||||
Notes: QL = Qualitative; QN (R) = Quantitative randomized controlled trials; QN (NR) = Quantitative non-randomized; QN (DC) = Quantitative descriptive; MX = Mixed-Method; Y = Yes; N = No; C = Can’t tell.