Skip to main content
. 2022 May 1;35(3):297–307. doi: 10.13075/ijomeh.1896.01878

Table 1.

Characteristics of the assessed participants and results of univariable regression models comparing patients with positive serological tests vs. those with negative results – data from 1696 municipal employees of 2 cities in Northern Portugal, assessed May 15–June 19, 2020

Variable Participants (N = 1696) OR (95% CI) p
total with positive serological test (N = 50)
Age [years] (M±SD) 46.1±11.0 45.2±11.9 1.0 (1.0–1.0) 0.568
Gender [n (%)]
 males 1256 (74.1) 29 (58.0) 0.5 (0.3–0.8) 0.007
 females 440 (25.9) 21 (42.0)
Cohabitation with a healthcare professional [n (%)] 199 (11.7) 6 (12.0) 1.0 (0.4–2.5) 0.934
Occupation [n (%)]
 firefighter 373 (22.0) 10 (20.0) 0.9 (0.4–1.8) 0.727
 police officer 177 (10.4) 6 (12.0) 1.2 (0.5–2.8) 0.716
 administrative assistant 137 (8.1) 7 (14.0) 1.9 (0.8–4.3) 0.126
 maintenance worker 174 (10.3) 5 (10.0) 1.0 (0.4–2.5) 0.949
Direct contact with COVID-19+ patients in professional activity [n (%)] 355 (21.0) 14 (28.0) 1.5 (0.8–2.8) 0.222
Use of mask in professional activity [n (%)] 1633 (96.3) 49 (98.0) 1.9 (0.3–13.9) 0.533
 since March or before 990 (58.4) 27 (54.0) 1.7 (0.2–12.8) 0.601
 since April 249 (14.7) 9 (18.0) 2.3 (0.3–18.4) 0.437a
 since May 394 (23.2) 13 (26.0) 2.1 (0.3–16.2) 0.484a
Confirmed COVID-19 case in the household [n (%)] 41 (2.4) 12 (24.0) 17.4 (8.3–36.8) <0.001
Possible risk exposure/contact [n (%)] 150 (8.8) 25 (16.7) 12.2 (6.8–21.8) <0.001
 at work 70 (4.1) 8 (11.4) 4.9 (2.2–10.8) <0.001
 in national or international travels 10 (0.6) 1 (10.0) 3.7 (0.7–19.9) 0.218
 with a family member 49 (2.9) 11 (22.4) 12.0 (5.7–25.1) <0.001
a

Reference group consisting of those patients who did not wear a mask in their professional activity.

Bolded are p-values <0.05.