Table 1.
Rate of ankylosis found in various studies with different types of interpositional material in management of temporomandibular joint ankylosis
| Serial No. | Study | Type of interpositional graft used | Re-ankylosis (%) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Sawhney9 (1986) | Acrylic spacer | 4.28 |
| 2 | Chossegros et al.10 (1999) | Full thickness skin graft | 10 |
| 3 | Erdem and Alkan11 (2001) | Acrylic marbles | 6.38 |
| 4 | Dimitroulis5 (2004) | Autogenous dermis fat graft | 7.69 |
| 5 | Huang et al.12 (2007) | Autogenous costal cartilage graft | 25 |
| 6 | Krishnan13 (2008) | Autogenous auricular cartilage | 10 |
| 7 | Singh et al.14 (2011) | Buccal fat pad | 0 |
| 8 | Rajurkar et al.15 (2017) | Temporomyofascial flap | 5.88 |
| 9 | Awal et al.16 (2018) | Costochondral graft | 32.7 |
| 10 | Anchlia et al.17 (2019) | • Temporalis • Temporalis and coronoid bone • Temporalis and costochondral graft |
• 8.70 • 6.52 • 26.09 |