Cho 2014.
Study characteristics | ||
Methods |
Study design: RCT Recruitment period: not reported Recruitment mode: the subjects had been diagnosed with acute LBP by specialists Statistical analysis: to examine differences between the 2 groups in accordance with the interventions, a paired t‐test was carried out. An independent t‐test was performed to compare the groups Sample size calculation: not reported |
|
Participants |
Sample size: total: 40; EG1: 20; EG2: 20 Setting: not reported Country: Republic of Korea Baseline characteristics
Duration of LBP: diagnosed with acute LBP, not further specified Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
|
|
Interventions |
EG1: stretching
EG2: Tai Chi
|
|
Outcomes |
Note: outcomes were not designated as major or minor outcomes Pain: VAS (0–10; converted to a 0–100 scale)
Other: muscle activity by surface electromyography Adverse events: not reported |
|
Notes |
Authors' results and conclusions: Tai chi was effective in decreasing pain and muscle activity of males with LBP in their 20s. Review authors' note: only a minimal difference was detected that was not clinically relevant. It is unclear whether the statistical test was performed between groups at 4 weeks. Funding: not reported Declaration of interest: no official disclosure regarding potential conflicts of interest |
|
Risk of bias | ||
Bias | Authors' judgement | Support for judgement |
Random sequence generation (selection bias) | High risk | Abstract states participants were randomly assigned, randomisation procedure not described. |
Allocation concealment (selection bias) | Unclear risk | Not described. |
Blinding All outcomes ‐ Participants | High risk | No mention of attempts to blind participants. |
Blinding All outcomes ‐ Healthcare providers | High risk | 2 active interventions. |
Blinding All outcomes ‐ outcome assessors | High risk | The outcome measures were self‐reported and participants were unblinded. |
Influence of co‐interventions | Unclear risk | Not reported. |
Group similarity at baseline | Unclear risk | Only pain and muscle activity were reported. |
Compliance | Unclear risk | Not reported. |
Timing of outcome assessments | Unclear risk | Pre‐ and post‐treatment. |
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) Dropouts – all outcomes | Unclear risk | Study does not report number of dropouts in each group. |
Intention‐to‐treat‐analysis | Unclear risk | No flow chart or other description of the number of participants before and after treatment. |
Selective reporting (reporting bias) | High risk | Study reported pain but not functional status. No protocol published. |
Other bias | Unclear risk | No funding sources reported. No official disclosure regarding potential conflicts of interest. |