Table 3.
Responses on 2wT acceptability and usability from 2wT clients.
| (N = 100) | Mean Likert Score |
|---|---|
| I understood the texting process well | 1.42 |
| I was clear on when to text, call, or come in for care | 1.49 |
| I understood the signs of poor healing | 1.9 |
| I felt safe with the daily texts | 1.61 |
| I felt that I could come to the clinic when I wanted | 2.7 |
| I felt confident that I would get the care I needed at the clinic | 2.03 |
| I feel satisfied with the texting follow-up | 1.63 |
| I would recommend texting follow-up to my friends | 1.75 |
| I was comfortable with this approach to MC follow-up care | 1.53 |
| I felt prepared to remove my bandages on Day 2 | 1.76 |
| I wanted help to remove my bandages on Day 2 | 3.32 |
| I wanted more texts on signs of adverse events | 2.65 |
| I was worried about my wound healing | 3.06 |
| I wanted more in-person follow-up | 3.15 |
| I had challenges sending texts | 3.62 |
| I had challenges receiving texts | 3.83 |
| The daily texts were a burden | 3.65 |
| I want fewer texts | 3.26 |
| I am worried about my privacy receiving these texts | 3.75 |
| No mandatory follow-up visits saved me money | 2.52 |
| No mandatory follow-up visits saved me time | 2.59 |
1, Strongly agree; 2, Agree; 3, No opinion; 4, Disagree; 5, Strongly Disagree.