Skip to main content
. 2023 Aug 16;14:1207955. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2023.1207955

Table 2.

Primary and secondary outcome variables and results (N = 46; all assessed at birth unless otherwise stated).

Primary outcome
Feasibility
Recruitment rate (number recruited/number screened, %) 46/101 46%
Intervention retention rates (number completing follow-up at 12-week postpartum/number recruited, %) 19/46 41%
CO sample rate (actual COs completed/total possible CO's, %) 2,030/3,545 57%
Number of counseling sessions completed (Mdn, range) 1 0–10
Women using NRT (reported >1 week use, %) 32/46 70%
Adherence to NRT (number who requested NRT after initial supply, %) 29/46 63%
Partners/household members receiving NRT (number, %) 10/46 22%
Secondary outcomes
Changes in tobacco smoking
Number of verified abstinent days ( ≤ 5 ppm; actual number of days/total possible number of days, %) 1,566/3,545 44%
Self-reported 7-day point prevalence verified by CO at birth ≤ 5 ppm (N%) 15 33%
Self-reported reduction in the number of cigarettes smoked/day in past 7-day baseline to last contact (M, p-value) 13 vs. 3 < 0.001
Changes in the management of smoke-free homes (number positive vs. negative vs. no change, p-value) 14 vs. 1 vs. 13 < 0.01
Changes in the management of smoke-free vehicles (number positive vs. negative vs. no change, p-value) 18 vs. 1 vs. 9 < 0.01
Treatment acceptability (N = 23)a Mdn IQR
Ease of participation 7 (6–10)
Intervention helpfulness 8 (7–10)
Convenience of taking part 8 (7–9)
Opinion of using CO meter 6 (5–9)
Opinion of earning financial incentives 10 (5–10)
Effectiveness of incentives 8 (5–10)
Effectiveness of telephone-based support 7 (4–10)
Effectiveness of NRT 9 (7–10)
Fairness of a government-funded service using incentives to aid smoking cessation 8 (7–10)

aRated using a 10-point visual analog scale with scores >5 considered favorable.