Skip to main content
. 2023 Jul 18;23(3):234–243. doi: 10.4103/jips.jips_65_23

Table 7.

Comparison of two different technology-based scanner based on the three-dimensional discrepancies observed between each intraoral scan and cone-beam computed tomography in the incisor, canine, and molar regions under the influence of 30 mm mouth opening and 50 mm mouth opening conditions

IOS Parallel confocal microscopy 3D in motion video technology with triangulation



Arch Coordinates and points Mesiopalatal cuspal M1 at 3 Mesiopalatal cuspal M2 (L) 14 Cuspal tip C1 at 6 Cuspal tip C2 (L) 11 Incisal edge I1 at 8 Mesiopalatal cuspal M1 (R) Mesiopalatal cuspal M2 (L) Cuspal tip C1 (R) Cuspal tip C2 (L) Incisal edge I1 (R)
Upper X coordinate
 Mean±SD −0.04±0.07 0.07±0.14 −0.05±0.07 −0.00±0.02 0.00±0.02 0.05±0.13 −0.02±0.08 −0.02±0.10 0.01±0.01 0.00±0.00
P 0.24 0.26 0.12 0.99 0.83 0.40 0.50 0.51 0.11 0.65
Y coordinate
 Mean±SD −0.01±0.04 0.02±0.10 −0.04±0.11 −0.06±0.11 0.00±0.09 −0.01±0.05 −0.00±0.06 −0.04±0.13 −0.03±0.06 −0.01±0.03
P 0.45 0.52 0.40 0.20 0.95 0.49 0.76 0.46 0.24 0.24
Z coordinate
 Mean±SD 0.04±0.08 0.08±0.14 −0.02±0.15 −0.12±0.20 −0.04±0.20 −0.02±0.10 −0.03±0.10 −0.11±0.15 0.02±0.08 −0.02±0.15
P 0.29 0.20 0.76 0.21 0.63 0.57 0.40 0.14 0.52 0.68
Lower X coordinate
 Mean±SD 0.01±0.08 −0.00±0.03 −0.00±0.04 −0.00±0.03 −0.00±0.01 −0.05±0.05 0.01±0.04 −0.00±0.02 −0.00±0.03 0.00±0.01
P 0.76 0.73 0.74 0.89 0.39 0.06 0.32 0.57 0.84 0.61
Y coordinate
 Mean±SD 0.00±0.06 −0.00±0.03 −0.01±0.03 0.00±0.03 −0.00±0.03 0.04±0.04 0.01±0.03 0.01±0.05 0.01±0.30 −0.01±0.02
P 0.89 0.85 0.42 0.63 0.87 0.08 0.44 0.60 0.43 0.17
Z coordinate
 Mean±SD −0.00±0.06 0.00±0.07 0.01±0.10 −0.00±0.15 0.02±0.09 −0.05±0.05 −0.06±0.07 −0.01±0.07 0.02±0.12 −0.11±0.15
P 0.99 0.77 0.80 0.94 0.51 0.05* 0.11 0.71 0.68 0.14

*Level of significance P<0.05. P value derived from independent sample t-test. 3D: Three dimensional, SD: Standard deviation, IOS: Intraoral scanner