Table 2.

Bonferroni P Values for Pairwise Comparisons of All Parameters Between Meniscal States at Different Knee Flexion Angles ^a

		Medial Meniscus			Lateral Meniscus
Pairwise Comparison b	Meniscal Extrusion, mm	Mean Contact Pressure, mm	Contact Area, mm2	Peak Pressure, MPa	Mean Contact Pressure, mm	Contact Area, mm2	Peak Pressure, MPa
0° of Flexion
(1) vs (2)	.039	.059	.003	.99	.80	.003	.99
(1) vs (3)	.085	.99	.008	.99	.99	.013	.99
(1) vs (4)	.46	.99	.015	.99	.99	.13	.99
(2) vs (3)	.082	.34	.99	.20	.48	.99	.33
(2) vs (4)	.044	.50	.99	.048	.32	.19	.91
(3) vs (4)	.9	.99	.99	.99	.99	.99	.99
30° of Flexion
(1) vs (2)	.2	.30	.058	.51	.11	.059	.33
(1) vs (3)	.6	.49	.062	.99	.77	.99	.99
(1) vs (4)	.9	.99	.017	.99	.99	.94	.99
(2) vs (3)	.9	.098	.29	.079	.059	.13	.66
(2) vs (4)	.052	.28	.99	.98	.098	.089	.96
(3) vs (4)	.9	.99	.99	.99	.99	.99	.96
60° of Flexion
(1) vs (2)	.052	.082	.051	.41	.23	.17	.54
(1) vs (3)	.9	.99	.24	.99	.99	.99	.99
(1) vs (4)	.9	.99	.061	.99	.99	.99	.99
(2) vs (3)	.1	.16	.29	.51	.089	.40	.35
(2) vs (4)	.8	.098	.99	.99	.15	.03	.34
(3) vs (4)	.9	.99	.99	.99	.99	.99	.99
90° of Flexion
(1) vs (2)	.0003	.086	.095	.93	.30	.13	.53
(1) vs (3)	.7	.99	.36	.99	.99	.55	.99
(1) vs (4)	.9	.99	.24	.99	.99	.18	.99
(2) vs (3)	.0001	.38	.42	.78	.084	.56	.13
(2) vs (4)	.012	.10	.41	.99	.23	.34	.67
(3) vs (4)	.9	.99	.99	.99	.99	.99	.99

^a Boldface P values indicate a statistically significant difference between comparisons (P < .05).

^b (1) = intact state; (2) = segmental defect state; (3) = inside-out segmental repair state; (4) = anchor plus inside-out segmental repair state.