Skip to main content
. 2023 Aug 30;23:186. doi: 10.1186/s12935-023-03019-0

Table 2.

Univariate and multivariate Cox regression analysis of TCIRG1 expression classifier and clinical characteristics with Overall Survival and Progression Free Interval in training cohort (n = 262)

Characteristics Overall survival Progression Free Interval
Univariate Multivariate Univariate Multivariate
HR (95%CI) p Value HR (95%CI) p Value HR (95%CI) p Value HR(95%CI) p Value

Age

(≥ 60 vs. < 60)

1.836(1.155–2.918) 0.010 1.626(1.018–2.596) 0.042 1.317(0.831–2.087) 0.242

Gender

(Male vs. Female)

1.121(0.695–1.808) 0.639 1.891(1.088–3.288) 0.024 1.944(1.106–3.417) 0.021

TNM stage

(III-IV vs. I-II)

3.262(2.060–5.166) < 0.001 2.248(1.365–3.701) 0.001 6.314(3.738–10.664) < 0.001 5.197(2.977–9.072) < 0.001

Pathological grade

(III-IV vs. I-II)

2.800(1.673–4.687) < 0.001 1.766(1.016–3.701) 0.044 4.079(2.276–7.308) < 0.001 2.340(1.284–4.267) 0.006

TCIRG1 expression

(High vs. Low)

2.409(1.554–3.736) < 0.001 1.679(1.061–2.658) 0.027 2.085(1.319–3.297) 0.002 1.315(0.813–2.126) 0.265

* TCIRG1 was divided into high and low expression groups with an optimal cutoff value of 3.82

TCIRG1 low expression: Gene expression level of TCIRG1 < 3.82;

TCIRG1 high expression: Gene expression level of TCIRG1 ≥ 3.82;

Statistical significance was calculated by Chi squared test or Fisher’s exact test for categorical/binary measures

Abbreviation: ccRCC, clear cell renal cell carcinoma