Skip to main content
. 2023 Aug 30;23:186. doi: 10.1186/s12935-023-03019-0

Table 3.

Univariate and multivariate Cox regression analysis of TCIRG1 expression classifier and clinical characteristics with Overall Survival and Progression Free Survival in validation cohort (n = 263)

Characteristics Overall survival Progression Free Interval
Univariate Multivariate Univariate Multivariate
HR (95%CI) p Value HR (95%CI) p Value HR (95%CI) p Value HR(95%CI) p Value

Age

(≥ 60 vs. < 60)

1.729 (1.123–2.663) 0.013 1.398(0.898–2.178) 0.138 1.379(0.892–2.132) 0.149

Gender

(Male vs. Female)

0.817(0.537–1.242) 0.344 1.265(0.798–2.006) 0.317

TNM stage

(III-IV vs. I-II)

4.760(3.028–7.481) < 0.001 3.509(2.159–5.701) < 0.001 7.036(4.274–11.581) < 0.001 5.868(3.476–9.907) < 0.001

Pathological grade

(III-IV vs. I-II)

2.467(1.554–3.915) < 0.001 1.432(0.878–2.335) 0.150 3.061(1.864–5.026) < 0.001 1.994(1.171–3.394) 0.011

TCIRG1 expression

(High vs. Low)

2.373(1.566–3.596) < 0.001 1.679(1.086–2.596) 0.020 1.658(1.075–2.559) 0.022 0.897(0.568–1.419) 0.643

* TCIRG1 was divided into high and low expression groups with an optimal cutoff value of 3.82

TCIRG1 low expression: Gene expression level of TCIRG1 < 3.82;

TCIRG1 high expression: Gene expression level of TCIRG1 ≥ 3.82;

Statistical significance was calculated by Chi squared test or Fisher’s exact test for categorical/binary measures

Abbreviation: ccRCC, clear cell renal cell carcinoma