Skip to main content
. 2023 Aug 31;13(9):e10456. doi: 10.1002/ece3.10456

TABLE 3.

Nonlinear curve fitting statistics for survivorship curves fitted to a power curve (#survivors – a × ageb) for recruiting populations at Parker Point, Thomson Bay, and Stark Bay between 2014 and 2018.

Location Curve fit a b t p Pseudo R 2 95% lower 95% upper
Parker Point Power #survivors = a × ageb 214.8 ± 28.1 −0.939 ± 0.072

a = 7.635

b = 0.072

a = <.001

b = <.001

.9029

a = 156.9

b = −1.087

a = 272.7

b = −0.791

Thomson Bay Power #survivors = a × ageb 197.9 ± 33.5 −0.712 ± 0.077

a = 5.898

b = −9.293

a = <.001

b = <.001

.7617

a = 129.5

b = −0.869

a = 266.3

b = −0.556

Stark Bay Power #survivors = a × ageb 72.4 ± 17.1 −0.486 ± 0.094

a = 17.124

b = 0.094

a = <.001

b = <.001

.4763

a = 37.5

b = −0.676

a = 107.3

b = −0.295

Note: Pseudo‐R‐squared statistic calculated using the Nagelkerke (Cragg and Uhler) method.