Skip to main content
. 2023 Jun 22;16(4):573–605. doi: 10.1016/j.jcmgh.2023.06.010

Table 3.

Abundance of Individual Markers in Ascending and Descending Colon Compared

Marker In Ascending Colon In Descending Colon χ21 Corrected P
NOS 52.6% 48.3% 4.8240 >.05
ChAT 55.5% 57.4% 0.9515 >.05
5-HT 2.4% 3.5% 2.7690 >.05
SP 7.3% 8.6% 1.4871 >.05
ENK 8.2% 11.9% 9.8167 .0208a
CGRP 0.9% 2.8% 12.4154 .0051a
SOM 1.3% 2.2% 2.8233 >.05
Calb 25.1% 27.9% 2.6564 >.05
Calret 8.7% 10.8% 2.9547 >.05
NF200 50.0% 53.3% 2.7426 >.05
VIP 31.3% 37.6% 11.3170 .0092a
NPY 8.0% 5.3% 7.7754 >.05

Comparison of overall frequency of 12 immunohistochemical markers between ascending (n = 6) and descending colon (n = 6) considered for each marker separately. From the cell counts, chi-square values were calculated. P values are shown after Bonferroni correction for multiple tests, revealing that 3 markers showed significant differences in abundance between upper and lower colon.

5-HT, 5-hydroxytryptamine; Calb, calbindin; Calret, calretinin; CGRP, calcitonin gene-related peptide; ChAT, choline acetyltransferase; ENK, leu enkephalin; NF200, neurofilament 200 kD; NOS, neuronal nitric oxide synthase; NPY, neuropeptide Y; SOM, somatostatin; SP, substance P; VIP, vasoactive intestinal polypeptide.

a

Significant (P < .05).