Table 4. Using preferred contraceptive method: Multivariable-adjusted mixed-effects logistic regression analyses (n = 1,974).

	Model 1: Main effects			Model 2: Main effects + interaction			Model 3: Main effects + interaction + sociodemographic controls§
	aOR	95% CI	p-value	aOR	95% CI	p-value	aOR	95% CI	p-value
State
Texas	0.58	(0.41–0.82)	0.002	0.65	(0.47–0.90)	0.009	0.62	(0.48–0.81)	<0.001
California (ref)	1.00			1.00			1.00
Insurance status
Uninsured	0.71	(0.53–0.95)	0.021	1.02	(0.64–1.62)	0.942	1.09	(0.68–1.75)	0.713
Insured (ref)	1.00			1.00
Don’t know	0.83	(0.65–1.06)	0.131	0.81	(0.62–1.07)	0.140	0.84	(0.64–1.10)	0.207
State*Insurance interaction
Texas*Uninsured				0.48	(0.29–0.81)	0.006	0.51	(0.30–0.87)	0.013
Texas*Don’t know				1.03	(0.56–1.88)	0.923	1.11	(0.62–2.00)	0.725
Constant	1.11	(0.91–1.34)	0.308	1.08	(0.89–1.31)	0.454	1.47	(1.17–1.84)	0.001

Note. aOR = adjusted odds ratio estimated from mixed-effects logistic regression models; CI = confidence interval.

^§ Sociodemographic controls are age, race/ethnicity, language spoken at home, and has child(ren).