Skip to main content
. 2023 Aug 28;26(9):1584–1594. doi: 10.1038/s41593-023-01413-5

Extended Data Fig. 9. Recurrence analysis for different number of latent factors.

Extended Data Fig. 9

The stability of the results shown in Fig. 5 with respect to the choice of the number of latent factors is explored (dashed vertical line denotes the 5 latent factors we used in Fig. 5). The first row (a, b) explores the hit-miss difference for the mean off-diagonal correlation; shown are (a) the effect size (dashed horizontal line denotes nil effect) and (b) the p-value of the observed effect (dashed horizontal lines denote p = 0.05, p = 0.01, and p = 0.001; two-sided Wilcoxon signed-rank test without correction multiple comparison), for all activity (black diamond), shared activity (purple crosses) and non-shared activity (pink crosses). The second row (c, d) explores the hit-miss difference for the mean on-diagonal covariance μV. The third row (e, f) explores the hit-miss difference for the standard deviation of the off-diagonal covariance σCC. The fourth row (g, h) explores the hit-miss difference for the ratio of the standard deviation of the off-diagonal covariance and the mean on-diagonal covariance σCC/μV. The fourth row (i, j) explores the hit-miss difference for the recurrence R. The fifth row (k, l) shows the same hit-miss difference for R, but uses Principal Component Analysis (PCA) instead of LFA to estimate shared activity.