Skip to main content
. 2023 Jun 24;31(10):4390–4398. doi: 10.1007/s00167-023-07492-y

Table 1.

Comparison between the recovery and nonrecovery groups

All patients
(N = 646)
The nonrecovery group
(n = 232)
The recovery group
(n = 414)
p value
Age, year 24.9 ± 10.5 28.1 ± 11.4 23.1 ± 9.6  < 0.001*
Sex, Female 322 (49.8) 126 (54.3) 196 (47.3) n.s
Body mass index, kg/m2 22.5 ± 3.2 23.0 ± 3.6 22.2 ± 3.0 0.003*
Preinjury sport level  < 0.001*
 Athlete 336 (52.0) 91 (39.2) 245 (59.2)
 Recreation 242 (37.5) 104 (44.8) 138 (33.3)
 No sport 68 (10.5) 37 (15.9) 31 (7.5)
Waiting time, months 14.6 ± 43.6 21.2 ± 58.6 10.9 ± 32.0 n.s
Surgery technique, Double bundle 496 (76.8) 179 (77.2) 317 (76.6) n.s
Medial meniscus injury, yes 204 (31.6) 84 (36.2) 120 (29.0) n.s
Lateral meniscus injury, yes 166 (25.7) 65 (28.0) 101 (24.4) n.s
Cartilage injury, yes 67 (10.4) 28 (12.1) 39 (9.4) n.s
Preoperative knee function
 LSI of quadriceps strength, % 67.7 ± 22.8 57.9 ± 21.3 71.6 ± 22.1  < 0.001*
 LSI of hamstring strength, % 77.6 ± 24.0 73.1 ± 26.0 80.1 ± 22.5  < 0.001*
 Anterior tibial translation, mm 5.3 ± 2.7 5.4 ± 2.8 5.2 ± 2.6 n.s
Postoperative Tegner activity scale scorea 6 [3–10] 5 [3–10] 7 [3–10]  < 0.001

Values are present as average ± standard deviation, median [minimum – maximum], and n (%)

LSI Limb symmetry index

aMissing data for 31 patients

*p < 0.05