Table 4.
Comparison of C-statistics for each independent predictor and the combination model for quadriceps strength recovery
| Predictor | AUC | vs. B | vs. C | vs. D | vs. E | vs. F | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| A | Age | 0.63 (0.58–0.67) | 0.005 | 0.013 | n.s | n.s | < 0.001 |
| B | Sex | 0.53 (0.49–0.58) | – | n.s | 0.016 | < 0.001 | < 0.001 |
| C | Body mass index | 0.56 (0.51–0.61) | – | – | n.s | < 0.001 | < 0.001 |
| D | Preinjury sport level | 0.61 (0.57–0.65) | – | – | – | 0.029 | < 0.001 |
| E | LSI of quadriceps strength | 0.68 (0.63–0.72) | – | – | – | – | 0.002 |
| F | The combination model | 0.73 (0.69–0.77) | – | – | – | – | – |
The combination model consisted of age, sex, body mass index, preinjury sport level, and LSI of quadriceps strength
AUC area under the curve, LSI limb symmetry index